ANGELS & DEMONS Blu-ray Review

by     Posted 4 years, 243 days ago

Angels and Demons movie image slice.jpg

One of the rules in the mystery thriller genre is that if you want to find your suspect for the killings, it’s probably not the obvious answer. One should be suspicious of the nice, the genteel, the physical unthreatening, and often the sexual repressed/fey types. If the idea is surprising your audience, the person in the first act cutting the brushes will probably not be the killer, unless he never shows up again, and the camera lingers (the Hunt for Red October rule). As mystery/thrillers go, Angels & Demons is perfectly competent, but never much more, and the person most likely to be the ringleader is evident if the rules above are paid attention to. My review of the Angels and Demons Blu-ray after the jump.

angels_and_demons_movie_image_tom_hanks_and_ayelet_zurer.jpgTom Hanks returns as Robert Langdon, called to the Vatican to help after the illuminati have shown their hand and threaten to kill the four leading contenders to replace the current – now deceased – pope. There’s also intrigue as the large haldron collider (hey!) has created anti-matter, and it’s been stolen, which is why Langdon teams up with the hot scientist Vittoria Vetra (Ayelet Zurer). He’s joined at the Vatican by the pope’s former assistant Camerlengo Patrick McKenna (Ewan McGregor), and inspector Richter (Stellan Skarsgard). Also at the Vatican, Cardinal Strauss (Armin Mueller-Stahl) who  is conducting the election for the next pope, but the four missing priests aren’t dead yet, so the election is postponed as long as it can as people wait outside for the results.

Langdon needs access to the library files of the Vatican to decode what the illuminati are going to do next, so he hits up their library and finds the answers he needs, which sends him from pope candidate to pope candidate hoping to rescue them before they’re killed. Some priests die in the interim, and it appears the illuminati have found their way into the Vatican with that missing anti-matter.

angels_and_demons_movie_image_ewan_mcgregor_and_armin_mueller-stahl.jpgIf the first film was sloppy, stupid, and based on strange, bullshity nonsense conspiracy theories to forward the plot, Angels & Demons is a little more anchored, but the plotting isn’t as heightened. There was something to the goofy nonsense of the first film’s “child of Jesus,” artwork revealing hidden truths that was good pulp fun. Whereas here, it doesn’t have the same sacrilegious kick, and audiences responded similarly as this did okay but wasn’t a global phenomenon like the first film. Ron Howard is a competent shooter, and the film gets across, but he doesn’t have the Hitchockian love for set pieces that would make this into more than the sum of a solid but unremarkable murder mystery. It’s also not very taut, which is the greatest sin a picture like this can commit. There’s a good sequence where the air goes out of a sealed room, but that’s about the highlight, and Langdon is more in running mode than genius mode. Still, a very forgettable night at the movies.

Sony presents the Blu-ray in a perfect widescreen (2.40:1) transfer and in English 5.1 DTS-HD. There are two cuts of the film, with the theatrical running 138, and the extended cut running 146 minutes. Negligible, but there you go. The film also comes with a digital copy. Extras on the second disc include “The Path of Illumination” which walks you through the locations of the film. This offers location tours, behind the scenes footage, text information, and info about what the location was used for specifically in the film. Then there’s some featurettes. “Rome was not Built in a Day” (18 min.) covers the making of the film, while “Writing Angels and Demons” (10 min.) gives David Koepp and Akiva Goldsman their propers for writing the film on the verge of the writer’s strike. “Characters in Search of the True Story” (18 min.) talks to the performers and “Cern: Pushing the Frontiers of Human Knowledge” (15 min.) gives the Collider its due. “Handling Props” (12 min.) gets into the work that goes into recreating the Vatican, while “Angels and Demons: The Full Story” (10 min.) wraps up the making of, while finally “This is an Ambigram” (5 min.) talks to the real Robert Langdon, who helps create the upside-down text that appears in the film (and can be read the same by rotating the text 180 degrees). This feels light, but no one was running on all cylinders with this film.




Like Us


Comments:

FB Comments

  • Andrew

    Tom Hanks is one of my favorite actors. He seems like a genuine person. I know we’re supposed to separate the actor from the person but that’s not always easy for the public to do. Which can work for them or against them. People love Tom Hanks so they look forward to watching his movies. For this same reason, I feel like I would have better enjoyed the movie if Mr. Sleazebag (Stellan Skarsgard) wouldn’t have been in it. He completely trashed the author of the Angels & Demons book which was probably very humiliating for the author. And of course he waits until AFTER production is over so that he doesn’t have to face anyone he worked with. How spiteful and cowardly of him. I’ve also heard that he divorced his wife of many years (and many children) to marry a pathetic daddy-seeking woman the same age as one of his own children. Yuck.

  • Andrew

    Tom Hanks is one of my favorite actors. He seems like a genuine person. I know we’re supposed to separate the actor from the person but that’s not always easy for the public to do. Which can work for them or against them. People love Tom Hanks so they look forward to watching his movies. For this same reason, I feel like I would have better enjoyed the movie if Mr. Sleazebag (Stellan Skarsgard) wouldn’t have been in it. He completely trashed the author of the Angels & Demons book which was probably very humiliating for the author. And of course he waits until AFTER production is over so that he doesn’t have to face anyone he worked with. How spiteful and cowardly of him. I’ve also heard that he divorced his wife of many years (and many children) to marry a pathetic daddy-seeking woman the same age as one of his own children. Yuck.

  • Andrew

    Tom Hanks is one of my favorite actors. He seems like a genuine person. I know we’re supposed to separate the actor from the person but that’s not always easy for the public to do. Which can work for them or against them. People love Tom Hanks so they look forward to watching his movies. For this same reason, I feel like I would have better enjoyed the movie if Mr. Sleazebag (Stellan Skarsgard) wouldn’t have been in it. He completely trashed the author of the Angels & Demons book which was probably very humiliating for the author. And of course he waits until AFTER production is over so that he doesn’t have to face anyone he worked with. How spiteful and cowardly of him. I’ve also heard that he divorced his wife of many years (and many children) to marry a pathetic daddy-seeking woman the same age as one of his own children. Yuck.

  • Jenny

    I like the first movie better. Also, I think Stellan Skarsgard is a decent actor (but far from being one of the greatest). And I totally agree that it can be difficult for the public to separate the actor from the person. But then again, he usually does play the evil character in movies so his jerk image might not hurt him too badly (with the exception of true fans who thought he was great in real life).

    That’s kinda how I feel with Will Smith who has turned kinda looney. I used to be a fan of his but it says a lot about a person if they let Tom Cruise convert them into Scientology. I read somewhere that he donated over 70 grand in 2008 to scientology groups. And now he’s trying to force this fake religion on his wife Jada and their kids. WTF? If I ever watch another movie of his I’ll just be thinking about what a psycho he has turned out to be.

  • Jenny

    I like the first movie better. Also, I think Stellan Skarsgard is a decent actor (but far from being one of the greatest). And I totally agree that it can be difficult for the public to separate the actor from the person. But then again, he usually does play the evil character in movies so his jerk image might not hurt him too badly (with the exception of true fans who thought he was great in real life).

    That’s kinda how I feel with Will Smith who has turned kinda looney. I used to be a fan of his but it says a lot about a person if they let Tom Cruise convert them into Scientology. I read somewhere that he donated over 70 grand in 2008 to scientology groups. And now he’s trying to force this fake religion on his wife Jada and their kids. WTF? If I ever watch another movie of his I’ll just be thinking about what a psycho he has turned out to be.

  • Jenny

    I like the first movie better. Also, I think Stellan Skarsgard is a decent actor (but far from being one of the greatest). And I totally agree that it can be difficult for the public to separate the actor from the person. But then again, he usually does play the evil character in movies so his jerk image might not hurt him too badly (with the exception of true fans who thought he was great in real life).

    That’s kinda how I feel with Will Smith who has turned kinda looney. I used to be a fan of his but it says a lot about a person if they let Tom Cruise convert them into Scientology. I read somewhere that he donated over 70 grand in 2008 to scientology groups. And now he’s trying to force this fake religion on his wife Jada and their kids. WTF? If I ever watch another movie of his I’ll just be thinking about what a psycho he has turned out to be.

  • http://www.air-jordan-8.com/ air jordan 8

    It looks good,I have learn a recruit!
    Recently,I found an excellent online store, the XX are completely various, good quality and cheap price,it’s worth buying! http://www.canno-tmake.com/

Click Here