The Road to Oscar: Best Supporting Actor

by     Posted 1 year, 304 days ago

best-supporting-actor-christoph-waltz-javier-bardem-slice

We’re only a short week away from the 85th Academy Awards, and with the close of Oscar season approaching, we’d thought this would be a nice opportunity to take a look back at how some of the races have played out, chronicling the ebbs and flows of the past 12 months or so that got us to where we are today.  We’re kicking things off with one of the more open categories: Best Supporting Actor.

One important thing to keep in mind when looking at the Oscars is that the race is incredibly fluid.  A film could be the clear frontrunner in a category one week, then might stumble to second or even third place in the ensuing weeks.  With this series of articles, we’ll be looking at exactly how much each race has changed, starting with Best Supporting Actor.  Hit the jump to read on.

MATTHEW-McCONAUGHEY-magic-mikeEvery year, the Supporting Actor and Supporting Actress categories are where prognosticators look for the surprises.  Though Best Picture and Best Director are usually down to two candidates or so by Oscar night, there’s always that feeling that a completely left-field choice could take home one of the supporting trophies.  As such, the Best Supporting Actor race was quite wide open leading up to the nominations, and there’s still a lack of consensus surrounding which actor might finally take home the gold.

Though the majority of the contenders arrived in the fall, a couple of viable candidates surfaced last summer by way of Dwight Henry for his excellent work in the Sundance hit Beasts of the Southern Wild and, somewhat surprisingly, Matthew McConaughey for his turn as a male stripper in Steven Soderbergh’s sleeper hit Magic Mike.  Henry held his own opposite his 6-year-old co-star Quvenzhane Wallis (who is nominated for Best Actress), and was singled out for a striking turn in one of the most emotional films of the year.  McConaughey was sublime in Magic Mike, and many wondered if the Academy might take notice to mark the unofficial “Year of McConaughey.”  While the two actors remained in the running as Dark Horse candidates, the possibility of getting in dwindled as the fall releases spurred a large batch of contenders.

argo-john-goodman-alan-arkinWhen Argo was declared the early frontrunner for Best Picture at the Telluride Film Festival, most surmised that the film’s best shot at an acting Oscar win would be in the Best Supporting Actor category; but for whom?  John Goodman, Bryan Cranston, and Alan Arkin all did great work in the film, and it was tough to discern which one or two had the best shot at Osacr.  As the weeks went on, however, it soon became clear that Arkin had the edge not only for his touching and humorous performance, but also because he’s an Oscar veteran with three nominations and one win under his belt.  The Academy is a big fan of Mr. Arkin, you see, and history matters.

Another strong supporting performance from the fall came from Philip Seymour Hoffman in director Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master.  Though the film turned out to be fairly polarizing among critics, the entire cast received unanimous praise for their incredible work onscreen.  A previous Oscar winner in the category, Hoffman was singled out for his calculating and tense performance as Lancaster Dodd and the actor remained a staple of the Best Supporting Actor contender list throughout the ensuing months.

robert-de-niro-silver-linings-playbookNipping at Argo’s Best Picture heels was another festival favorite, Silver Linings Playbook, and though his screentime isn’t lengthy and his character isn’t flashy, Robert De Niro gained a considerable amount of praise for his work in the film.  Whether critics were simply happy to see the Raging Bull star in a good movie for once or if his performance really is that great is a topic of debate, but as The Weinstein Company kicked their awards campaign for SLP into high gear (they’re pretty great at this Oscar-marketing thing), De Niro’s performance remained a primary component of their hunt for Oscar glory.

Heading into November, two more major contenders surfaced.  Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln struck a chord with audiences and critics alike, and while the praise was deservedly heaped on Daniel Day-Lewis for his incredible portrayal of the president, Tommy Lee Jones also earned high marks for his powerful supporting work.  Jones previously won this award for The Fugitive, and while he essentially plays a Tommy Lee Jones version of Thaddeus Stevens, it’s nevertheless powerful stuff.

james-bond-skyfall-javier-bardem-2The performance-driven drama solidified itself as a major awards contender upon release, with Day-Lewis and Jones leading the pack in the hunt for acting nods.  James Spader was also singled out for his stellar work in the film, but his limited screentime coupled with Jones and Day-Lewis commanding most of the attention meant that a serious bid for a Best Supporting Actor nomination on Spader’s behalf was likely out of reach.

The other major contender from November came by way of a James Bond film.  While audiences were eager to sit back and take in the fun of Skyfall, moviegoers were pleasantly surprised to see that director Sam Mendes crafted not only a thrilling entry in the franchise, but quite possibly one of the best Bond films of all time, complete with a new classic Bond villain brought to life by Javier Bardem.  The previous Best Supporting Actor winner (I’m sensing a theme here…) was unforgettable as the flamboyant and nefarious Silva, and he quickly became a serious contender in the hunt for Oscar.

As we headed into December, all eyes were on Les Miserables and Django Unchained.  With the former being hailed as an Oscar juggernaut before anyone had even seen the film, Russell Crowe was already on the shortlist for Best Supporting Actor.  When the film finally did screen and was met with a rather mixed response, Crowe became less of a sure thing and more of an outside possibility.  Reactions were split on Crowe’s performance as Javert, with half saying his singing was terrible and the other half saying he was perfectly in tune with the character.  Whatever the case, Crowe never made much of a splash and quickly found himself a long shot for a nomination.  The dark horse contender from the film, though, was Eddie Redmayne who found himself singled out as a possible surprise nominee, though the lack of passion for the film overall kept him from ever rising to the front of the pack.

django-unchained-movie-image-leonardo-dicaprioThen came Quentin Tarantino’s Django Unchained.  The prospect alone of Leonardo DiCaprio taking on a villainous role in a Tarantino movie was prime for Oscar glory, but when the film finally opened, audiences and critics found that the pic was an embarrassment of riches as far as the performances were concerned.  DiCaprio was stupendous as expected, but Samuel L. Jackson was unforgettably nasty as Steven and Christoph Waltz absolutely shined as Django’s companion.  Prognosticators were now faced with a conundrum: which supporting actor from Django gets a nomination, or do they all split the votes and result in a Django shutout?  It was essentially a crapshoot, and a consensus didn’t really circle around one single candidate in the weeks leading up to the Oscar nominations.

When the Screen Actors Guild Awards nominations were announced, it seemed as though three of the spots had been firmed up with Tommy Lee Jones, Alan Arkin, and Robert De Niro considered near-locks for Oscar nominations.  SAG filled out the rest of the category with Philip Seymour Hoffman and Javier Bardem.  Support for The Master was waning so Hoffman’s spot seemed to be in jeopardy, though he was a better bet than Bardem for Oscar.  In the days leading up to the Oscar nominations, some were predicting a snub for De Niro or Hoffman in favor of a surprise like Matthew McConaughey or Dwight Henry.  There was also the Django question, with many playing it safe by going with DiCaprio for the nomination over Waltz and Jackson and some leaving Django off the list altogether.

The Oscar nominations have been announced and we’re now left with five previous Academy Award winners who will be gunning for Oscar glory: Tommy Lee Jones, Alan Arkin, Robert De Niro, Christoph Waltz, and Philip Seymour Hoffman.  Any one of these actors has a serious shot at winning on Oscar night, and I expect we’ll see even more ebbs and flows as we move closer to the ceremony.

Keep checking back here on Collider in the coming days as we take a look back at the Oscar races in quite a few other categories.

olly-moss-oscar-poster




Like Us


Comments:

FB Comments

  • Anonymous

    I thought Hoffman had more range and gave a greater performance. Christoph Waltz will take it though, he is too likeable and articulate not to win – it was the best performance in Django for sure.

  • Keegan

    I feel like the guys here at Collider might be a little anti-Master. I thought Hoffman was EASILY the strongest supporting performance. Jones and Waltz would be 2 and 3. DeNiro and Arkin, if you ask me, were given courtesy nominations since two fine actors didn’t really bring their A-Game. They just happened to be fun characters in great movies. Bardem was something else. Comparable to Ledger’s performance of the Joker. I want to give it DiCaprio for Django, but I think my judgment is unclear. Calvin Candie was one of the greatest fictional characters I’ve ever seen, so sometimes it’s difficult to determine what was the acting and what the character. A really underrated performance was McConaughey in Killer Joe. So many people loved him in Magic Mike, I think they didn’t even bother checking him in Killer Joe. Fassbender in Prometheus (love it or hate it everyone) and Ezra Miller in Perks of Being a Wallflower were two other underrated performances I wouldn’t have minded grabbing a few more accolades in awards season than they came out with. Whatever, though. The Academy didn’t do bad this year, though it’s a long road to recovery to make up for the atrocity that was the 84th Academy Awards… Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close? I still shudder sometimes…

    • Person

      DeNiro’s performance was fairly strong, but I agree with you about Arkin. I woulda liked to see Bardem or DiCaprio get that nomination instead. I really though DiCaprio was a lock for at least a nomination, but when I saw Django Unchained after the nominations were announced, Waltz’s performance grew on me quite a bit. Jackson being overlooked makes sense though; his performance was by no means bad, but he basically plays “Sam Jackson in makeup”.

      I think Jones will win it, but I’d like to see DeNiro or Waltz take it. Jones was good, but the other two were better.

      • Keegan

        I definitely agree with about Jackson. Love the guy and in Django, he was fucking hilarious and entertaining and exactly what you expect from a Tarantino movie… but it was just Samuel L. Jackson. And by the way, I’m not calling DeNiro’s or Arkin’s performances at all bad. They were excellent, it’s just that I personally believe they weren’t exceptionally strong enough for Oscar nods. DeNiro was the stronger of the two, though. Oh well, I guess that’s the fun part about all this. Getting to decide for yourself who was better than others

    • Matt

      Hoffman’s performance is absolutely underrated. He was actually even billed as lead at first when The Master came out at TIFF bac in September. Arkin’s was definitely the weakest of the bunch. I would’ve loved to see Javier Bardem in his place instead. But aside from them both playing flamboyant villains, I wouldn’t go as far as to say it’s comparable to Ledger’s. That was iconic.

      • Keegan

        Oh no man, I meant comparable to Ledger in terms of character and the fun psychopathic madness of a good villain. What Heath Ledger did on screen for TDK… beyond me.

  • Matt

    I love the Oscars but each year get more frustrated with its bias. Hoffman was a volcano in The Master and deserves the win in my opinion, however TLJ or Waltz would be worthy winners also. How De Niro and Arkin get nominations is beyond me, They were both great but when I saw their respective films they didn’t do enough to justify an Oscar nod (don’t get me started on Jackie Weaver). Bardem should have spot four and the fifth spot is up in the air. I would probably go with Redmayne though, he definitely had a harder job to do than Arkin or De Niro.

  • Keegan

    I definitely agree with about Jackson. Love the guy and in Django, he was fucking hilarious and entertaining and exactly what you expect from a Tarantino movie… but it was just Samuel L. Jackson. And by the way, I\’m not calling DeNiro\’s or Arkin\’s performances at all bad. They were excellent, it\’s just that I personally believe they weren\’t exceptionally strong enough for Oscar nods. DeNiro was the stronger of the two, though. Oh well, I guess that\’s the fun part about all this. Getting to decide for yourself who was better than others

  • Bob

    I tough Hoffman deserved the nom for sure but in no way deserves to win it. I guess that just shows how people’s opinions differ. I think Waltz should win it, or Jones. Both were fantastic.

    My list would have been as follows

    Waltz
    DiCaprio
    Jackson
    Jones
    Hoffman

    I wouldn’t mind Di Nero over Hoffman.

    • chanandeler bong

      Agree with you a hundred percent. As Adam pointed out, it seems that the academy must have thought that nominating all the actors from Django would be weird or soemthing, and the academy is not really know for making bold moves or rewarding great work at the moment. They like to play it diplomatically and analyse all possibilities and hand out awards in such a way that everybody wins, or at least with least amount of bad blood. “Arkin and DeNiro are respected actors, so obviously they should be nominated. Caprio and others can win someother time” is what they probably thought.

  • Arnold

    So disappointed that Martin Freeman or Ian McKellen of The Hobbit is not on the list, they better have them in the second and third films

  • -

    My nominations would have been the same, except I would’ve substituted Alan Arkin for Javier Bardem. I dunno how Arkin was nominated, considering I can think of one better supporting performance (Cranston) in the same fucking film, never mind the great supporting performances of Bardem, DiCaprio (even though I think his performance was a little overrated), Samuel L Jackson, Dwight Henry, etc in other films.
    Should win: Hoffman. I don’t mean to be pretentious, but I hardly see how there’s any competition. For me, Waltz was the only other nominee who was even in the same league.
    Will Win: It’s close, but at this point I’d still go with Tommy Lee Jones. Christoph Waltz probably has as good a chance though.

  • Brian

    Everybody seems to have completely forgotten about the huge buzz that THE GREY had at the beginning of 2012. Frank Grillo turned in a great performance that people were sure would net a nomination.

  • Pingback: The Road to Oscar: Best Supporting Actress | Collider

  • Pingback: The Road to Oscar: Best Actor 2013 Preview | Collider

  • Pingback: The Road to Oscar: Best Actress 2013 | Collider

  • Pingback: The Road to Oscar: Best Director | Collider

  • Pingback: The Road to Oscar: Best Picture | Collider

Click Here