Bill Murray Talks GHOSTBUSTERS 3 on Letterman

by     Posted 3 years, 110 days ago

slice_ghostbusters_3_bill_murray_01.jpg

As confirmed earlier this month, Bill Murray is going to be in Ghostbusters 3. I don’t think this was a huge shock to most people because he is the face of that franchise but it’s exciting to think of Murray being Dr. Peter Venkman yet again. Also recently we saw reports of the movie possibly shooting this summer. But this week Murray sat down with David Letterman and the two got to talking about both Ghostbusters 3 as well as the Ghostbusters video game.

Murray, at least on the show, claims that he would only be in the third installment of Ghostbusters if he was killed off early on in the film. He doesn’t seem too keen on the idea, saying he didn’t like Ghostbusters 2 even and that the third film was his “nightmare”.

For the video as well as everything we know thus far on Ghostbusters 3, hit the jump.

Here’s everything we know thus far:

  • Ghostbusters 3 will likely be 3D.
  • The film is being directed by Ivan Reitman (Ghostbusters, Kindergarten Cop) and written by Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky, who co-wrote Year One together
  • All four of the original cast members are confirmed to return to the movie, with Sigourney Weaver still only rumored.
  • Dan Aykroyd told Empire Magazine last year that he had hoped Alyssa Milano would reprise her role as Dr. Ilyssa Selwyn from the Ghostbusters: Video Game.

The video doesn’t really add much more to the news, and I hope Murray is kidding about getting killed off in the first reel. He seems fairly negative on the franchise which is a shame. Some of us actually enjoyed Ghostbusters 2, I know I did.

ghostbusters_movie_image_harold_ramis__bill_murray_and_dan_aykroyd.jpg

Sponsored Content



Please Like Collider on Facebook

Comments:
  • http://r4cards.co.nz/ r4 games

    I think that Murray realises that a third Ghostbusters without him probably wouldn’t go ahead or wouldn’t be the big draw it would be with him. But at the same time he doesn’t want to retread old ground, repeating the same sort of jokes whilst rebuilding that chemistry which was prevalent in at least the first one. So that’s why I see him coming back, being killed off but maybe doing a few scenes as a ghost so it brings something different to the equation.

  • http://r4cards.co.nz/ r4 games

    I think that Murray realises that a third Ghostbusters without him probably wouldn’t go ahead or wouldn’t be the big draw it would be with him. But at the same time he doesn’t want to retread old ground, repeating the same sort of jokes whilst rebuilding that chemistry which was prevalent in at least the first one. So that’s why I see him coming back, being killed off but maybe doing a few scenes as a ghost so it brings something different to the equation.

  • Pingback: First Logo for MEN IN BLACK 3 (or “MIIIB in 3D”) and SPIDER-MAN in 3D

  • Gir

    This is coming from the guy that did Garfield… just saying.

  • Jude713

    I would be ok with him being killed off if they do it correctly. It's a comedy, and Ivan Reitman can be great with darker comedy, so it could add to the movie if they don't make it a big tragic event. Not to mention it would be kind of sad to see him stick around just to be in the background the whole time if it's true that a younger crowd of people are going to be the new ghostbusters/main characters.

  • Pingback: Dan Aykroyd Updates on GHOSTBUSTERS 3 Without Bill Murray

Features

Demand Media Entertainment

Click Here