CARRIE May Be Found Footage; Could Sam Raimi Direct POLTERGEIST? [UPDATE: Raimi Will Produce POLTERGEIST; Julianne Moore Offered Role in CARRIE]

by     Posted: April 27th, 2012 at 12:57 pm

carrie-poltergeist-slice

We’ve got a couple of horror related stories to share with you this afternoon.  Roger Birnbaum, CEO of MGM, recently gave talks at the University of Denver and he dropped some nuggets of info about a few remakes in the MGM pipeline.  Furthest along is the redo of CarrieKimberly Peirce (Boys Don’t Cry) is set to direct and Chloe Moretz is officially onboard in the lead role, first played by Sissy Spacek in the 1976 adaptation of the Stephen King novel.  Moreover, Julianne Moore is reportedly in talks to take on the crazy mother role.  During the talk at the University of Denver, Birnbaum revealed that some of the film may be done in the found footage style.  Hit the jump for more. [Update: Moore has recently been offered the role for Carrie. Sam Raimi will reportedly produce Poltergeist, but won't direct. More after the jump.]

carrie-imageThe updates on the project come from a Reddit recap of the event (via Movies.com), and Birnbaum apparently let slip that Carrie will be, at least partially, found footage.  I loathe this genre with a passion, but Movies.com points out that King’s original novel is interspersed with “official” documents recounting the events of Carrie’s prom night.

We had heard that Peirce planned to return to the source material for this adaptation, so this found footage aspect would actually be keeping in step with how King’s novel is laid out.  This is the kind of found footage that I think actually works well when done right, so hopefully we’ll just be given bits and pieces of the technique throughout the film (or possibly as an opening sequence?).

sam-raimi-poltergeistMoving on, Birnbaum also dropped another slightly less solid piece of information.  When someone mentioned the Poltergeist remake that’s in development in the studio, Birnbaum apparently mentioned that Sam Raimi is in talks to direct.  The director wouldn’t be an entirely out of left field choice, but given how he’s been working in much larger studio fare as of late (he’s currently directing Oz, The Great and Powerful), I find it a bit hard to believe that he’d actually direct a remake of Poltergeist.  It’s more likely that Raimi will come onboard as a producer and shepherd the project through development, as he’s doing with the Evil Dead remake.

It’s important to note that all of this information comes from a Reddit post, so some or all of the aforementioned details could be inaccurate.  I don’t have a hard time seeing Carrie featuring some sort of found-footage aspect (especially since the genre is all the rage), but the “Raimi directing Poltergeist” story is probably less likely to happen.

Update: (Dave here.) Right you are, Adam! Heat Vision reports that Raimi has come on board Poltergeist to produce but has no plans to direct the remake. He will, however, oversee the search for a helmer. In other convenient update news, Deadline is reporting that MGM has indeed offered Moore the role of religious fanatic mother to Moretz’s title character.  Moore should have the script in hand as part of a pay-or-play deal for the role that landed Piper Laurie an Oscar nod.




Please Like Collider on Facebook

Comments:

Anonymous Comments: (17 Responses)

    • You’re in the minority growndhawgg,…Poltergeist is a classic & won an oscar for best visual effects,if i remember correctly.I think it was also nominated for best sound effects &/or music score too!
      Shame about the sequels though!

  1. Just because movie remakes are “more faithful to the book” does NOT make them better than the original films. Many books are full of unnecessary exposition, authors getting wrapped up in their characters’ subtexts and just plain bad writing/plotting. The DePalma film is excellent and still holds up today. We didn’t need a first remake and certainly not a second one. Stephen King, while certainly accomplished is not the greatest at his craft. There is a reason many of his books are SOOOO long. Cut the fat. Keep the story moving.

    • You are right, even King loved the De Palma version, mostly because he tough that his book was amateurish and the movie condensed everything for good.

    • Not the greatest at his craft? Actually he is one of the greatest horror writers of all time. Maybe not one of the greatest writers of all time but you would be hard pressed to name someone in the horror genre who is better. When a book is really good you don’t want it to end. Stephen King’s It was a masterpiece and I for one was happy it was so long. Nothing better then getting 200 pages into an awesome book and knowing you’ve got another 800 pages to go.

  2. The problem with the ‘found footage’ concept for CARRIE in regards to getting back to the book is it can’t work unless if you completely betray the book & bring it up to date.

    I would love to see a found footage movie shot on super grainy 8mm or 16mm but that won’t happen. Instead we’re gonna get another gimmicky Red Epic/Alexa standing in for iPhones & other cheap ways to make the movie on the cheap. I mean who needs majestically choreographed dolly shots & DePalma magic when you can have lots of pixelated handheld stuff?

    …. i do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Security Code:

Features

IndieClick Film Network

Click Here