Comic-Con 2011: BATMAN: YEAR ONE Review

by     Posted 3 years, 148 days ago

comic-con-batman-year-one-slice

Warner Bros’ new direct-to-video animated Batman: Year One is about as faithful an adaptation of the Frank Miller and David Mazzucchelli source material as could be done – potentially to its own detriment. The problem being that the episodic nature of the comic doesn’t necessarily lend itself to the dramatic momentum needed for film. An issue about Batman getting into a fight with a bunch of pimps which in turn leads to a brawl with a pre-Catwoman Selena Kyle works on the page; on film, it halts the main thrust and drive of the film – namely that of the relationship between Jim Gordon and Bruce Wayne/Batman. Year One is at it’s best when it focuses on the fraught almost Heat-like (picture Jim Gordon as Pacino and Batman as De Niro) relationship between the two. My review after the jump.

batman-year-one-blu-ray-cover-imageBruce Wayne has just come back to Gotham – having trained extensively in martial arts post his parents’ untimely demise. From the plane looking down on the city, Wayne remarks of the filth and decay that has taken over the streets of his once great home. He vows to clean them up – no matter what the cost. At the same moment, Jim Gordon arrives with his wife Barbara ready to start a new life in Gotham only to quickly discover the rotten corruption at the heart of the city. The film tracks how these two men attempt to fix and restore Gotham – Gordon doing so by attempting to tightrope the tricky morally-grey politics behind the crime of the city, whilst Wayne (of course) dons a Bat costume taking out thugs vigilante style. It’s only a matter of time before Jim Gordon and Batman find themselves at odds.

There’s still novelty in seeing different sides to these beloved characters: Jim Gordon beating up corrupt police officers and leaving them naked in the road, Batman really struggling to fight his foes, often times losing the brawl and getting shot/beat up. Neither man is perfect or “superhero”-like – and it’s the introduction of such moral ambiguities – Batman’s incompetence, Gordon’s rashness and disloyalty – that makes the film stand out, much to the same effect as its comic counterpart.

The voice acting across the board is relatively strong. Ben McKenzie ably conveys the youthfulness and inexperience of a young Batman. Katee Sackhoff and Eliza Dushku both do the most they can with relatively brief screen-time. But (not surprisingly) the standout of the film is Bryan Cranston as Jim Gordon. The gruff cold detached vocal inflections Cranston brings to the character suggest years of seen-it-all hard knock experience. This is a colder, meaner Gordon and Cranston’s presence lends a gravitas to the character previously unseen.

It may be sacrilegious to say but Batman: Year One could benefit from some slight deviations to the source material to better suit the film medium. As this is not the case – the film doesn’t necessarily stand out or add anything new to Frank Miller’s tale. One would still be better spent rereading the comic.

Quick to add: following the screening, Bruce Timm announced the next three DC Animated Universe films – 1) Justice League: Doom 2) an adaptation of Superman vs. The Elite 3) a two part retelling of Batman: The Dark Knight Rises.

Click here for all our Comic-Con 2011 coverage.

batman-year-one-movie-image-02




Like Us


Comments:

FB Comments

  • broski

    “3) a two part retelling of Batman: The Dark Knight Rises.”

    I think you mean “Returns” :-P

  • fuko

    There’s idiot, and there’s Idiot. And this moron’s comparison between Year One and Heat falls under the darkest pits of Hell itself. Don’t fucking recall Dark Knight, it has nothing to do with this.

  • mark tornits

    “a two part retelling of Batman: The Dark Knight Rises.”

    i think it is actually supposed to be The Dark Knight returns.

  • Edward Lee

    Sounds to me like this only underscores why you SHOULDN’T do faithful adaptations of Frank Miller work: it’s all just a bit overrated.

    • ShadesAtKnight

      His work on Batman is definately overrated, Dark Knight Returns and All Star, in particular. I think Year One is quite great, but not the “masterpiece” people try and make it out to be.

      • Jerry T

        I haven’t heard comic fans describe Year One as a masterpiece but it is comparatively the best telling of Batman’s early years in the medium and has thus become influential even on Chris Nolan. On another note fans don’t automatically hate changes made to source in translating to screen but many to date have been aggravating and much frustration is understandable.

  • Pingback: Pierwsze recenzje “Batman: Year One” | BatCave

  • Pingback: SDCC2011 Warner Bros. /DC Entertainment coverage « The Daily P.O.P.

  • Bill Graham

    I really enjoyed the film. I love that it shows so many sides that we aren’t used to seeing from Gordon and Bruce. I havent read YEAR ONE in a while and a lot of the plot points still felt familiar, yet they were exciting as well.

    I honestly can’t wait for more.

  • Pingback: CATWOMAN Animated Short Film Image

  • Pingback: BATMAN: YEAR ONE Movie Clip

  • Pingback: BATMAN: YEAR ONE New Movie Clip

  • Pingback: Batman Year One trailer « Valley of the Deer

  • earn money online|earn money|online money

    I do accept as true with all the ideas you’ve offered in your post. They are very convincing and can definitely work. Still, the posts are too quick for novices. May just you please lengthen them a bit from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.

Click Here