David Yates to Direct DOCTOR WHO Movie

     November 14, 2011


David Yates, who directed the last four Harry Potter movies, is set to helm a big-screen adaptation of the popular and long-running TV series Doctor Who.  For those unfamiliar with the series, it follows an alien known as The Doctor who goes around with a human companion on mostly episodic adventures across space and time.  The Doctor is a “Time Lord” who travels in the TARDIS (which looks like a 1960s-style London police box), and he can be incarnated in different forms (i.e. new actors) up to twelve times and TV show is currently on the 11th Doctor (Matt Smith).  However, Yates says his version will not follow the current TV series and will be a completely fresh approach.  It’s a smart move because you don’t risk angering fans of the TV series, or forcing newcomers to catch up with a show that’s been on and off and back on the air from 1963 to 1989 and rebooted in 2005.

Hit the jump for more details on the movie.

doctor-who-tardis-image-01Yates tells Variety,

“We’re looking at writers now. We’re going to spend two to three years to get it right.  It needs quite a radical transformation to take it into the bigger arena.”

This past weekend, Yates told Steve that he plans to work on a smaller movie before jumping back into blockbuster studio fare (Yates was previously attached to follow up Harry Potter with a blockbuster remake/re-adaptation of Stephen King’s The Stand).  Presumably, Yates will do script-stage work on Doctor Who while he does his smaller movie.  Yates says,

“We’re looking at writers now. We’re going to spend two to three years to get it right,” he said. “It needs quite a radical transformation to take it into the bigger arena.”

Yates and producer Jane Tranter are currently looking at writers in the UK and the US even though Doctor Who has always been a British TV series.  However, the “British sensibility” won’t be lost, “but having said that,” notes Yates, “Steve Kloves wrote the Potter films and captured that British sensibility perfectly, so we are looking at American writers too.”

Yates found the material appealing because “the notion of the time-travelling Time Lord is such a strong one, because you can express story and drama in any dimension or time.”  I’ve never seen an episode of Doctor Who, but Yates did an outstanding job on Harry Potter and I think Who fans should be excited to have such a talented director on the job.   But perhaps Who fans feel differently, so sound off in the comments section about Yates getting the job and what you want to see in a big-screen Doctor Who movie.


  • Pingback: ‘Harry Potter’ director David Yates to director ‘Doctor Who’ film! - Hypable()

  • Sam

    Bring back David Tennant for this!!

    • Jackie

      While I liked David Tennant, I don’t want him back!

      • MattCYND

        I’d love to see Benedict Cumberbatch as The Doctor :D

      • Anonymous

        as long as David Tennant is in it I’ll be happy.

  • AT

    I’m not sure how I feel about this. I guess it depends on what he does, who he casts, etc… I’m hoping he doesn’t revert to the idea of an asexual doctor.

    Of course I think David Tennant would be perfect to reprise the role under a completely different interpretation (even though I absolutely LOVED RTD’s show), but that may not be possible! I also would love to see more Billie Piper and David Tennant interaction because their chemistry = golden. It would be interesting to see a completely different story with a bigger budget, but with two of the same actors.

    BUT, I know that most likely won’t happen so I’m open to seeing who they cast and what story will be told. David Yates is a good choice to direct anyway.

    I guess this is a wait and see for me.

    • Chaster

      Hell no to Billie Piper! Rose was an awful companion.

      • AT

        I don’t think they’ll get her. That was more wishing, unrealistically mind you, for more Doctor and Rose with a different story. But calling her the worst companion ever in response to my own opinion is silly. Clearly Rose is a popular character amongst most fans. Besides, you have your opinion and I have mine.

    • Kym

      Why bring back Billie Piper? She is the most over rated compaion in Doctor Who history. If there going to bring back a companion from the tv series it should be ether Catherine Tate or Karen Gillan!

      • AT

        Catherine Tate would be awesome. They should bring in Rose and Donna! :) That said, for something to be overrated it means that it needs to be popular. So you might not like her, but many do.

      • Kym

        Seriously? The only good thing you can say about Rose is that she is popular? Just because she’s popular doesn’t mean she’s a good character. Hence the term overrated!

  • Tarek

    Muahahaha! best joke of the day. David Yates ? really ?

  • Elisha

    Shia LaBeouf, Zac Efron, Anton Yelchin, Ed Westwick, Penn Badgley, Adam Brody, Chace Crawford or Emile Hirsch as the Doctor

    • Sara

      BLECHHHHHHHH Well, you’re clearly a thirteen-year-old girl. Zac Efron and Shia Labeouf? Really? that’s laughable. Go watch High School Musical.

  • Jason Lop

    They’ve done this. Twice before. Peter Kushing played Dr. Who (a character actually called Dr. Who, as opposed to The Doctor) in two non-canon films in the ’60s.

    I just don’t get why you’d want to mess with one of the few series with an extremely well-established decades-long continuity. If the 2005 “semi-reboot” can play off of everything else, so can a film.

  • Guest

    What’s the point of making a Doctor Who film if you’re not going to follow the tv-series’ continuity? The fact that it’s all one big piece of continuity, from the 1st doctor to the 11th, is part of the whole charm.

    And then the “It needs quite a radical transformation to take it into the bigger arena” part. What are they going to do, redesign the Tardis and the Daleks?

    This all sounds like a classic case of just trying to cash in on something’s popularity without any respect for the source material if you ask me.

  • Sami

    The only way I’d want to see a Doctor Who movie is if it was David Tennant, and DID adhere to the story somewhat. We know we don’t see ALL of the Doctor’s adventures, or the series would be REALLY long(1000 years +), so it would be wise to just go back and see a new Tenth Doctor adventure, one we skipped over, but one that’s big enough for the big screen.

  • Pingback: ‘Harry Potter’ Director To Tackle ‘Dr. Who’ Movie | The Fandom Post()

  • Zane

    In my personal opinion, Yates has been awful at properly adapting the Harry Potter books and I want him to get away from the Doctor Who franchise AS FAR AS POSSIBLE.

  • Kitsune

    Bring Moffat aboard, he doesn’t have to write the whole thing alone, but he needs to be in the team at least. Moffat, Neil Gaiman and Russel T. Davies would be a great writing team. As for David Yates as the director: -.-

    • Kitsune

      …as for the idea in general:
      I’m all in as long as they succeed in making a quality product worthy the name of Doctor Who. It needs the same quality as the TV-series, the humor, action, drama, horror, absurdity and insanity.

      I kinda like the idea that it doesn’t have anything to do with the current storyline or any of the actors, but that makes it necessary to use quite a lot of time to introduce all characters, which might make this adaption end up like the last attempt. Let’s hope the writing team does a better job this time around. I’m a fan, so I’m going to watch this no matter how it turns out. It would’ve been safer to choose a place in Tennant’s timeline though, like before he parted with Rose or during the Specials Season or something. Would please the fangirls as well as making the transition into another format easier.

      As for the “WHO’S GONNA STAR” part: Brits, but not Hollywood Brits. There’s lots of young talent in Britain, so shouldn’t be too hard, although the Doctor is a really demanding character to play. Just hope they don’t make him female, the Whoniverse isn’t ready for that yet.


  • pills_26


    I know I should be forming a coherent opinion weighing out certain pros and cons about this news, but my brain still can’t handle the fact THERE WILL BE A DOCTOR WHO MOVIE!!!

  • becca


    or please please please have this movie be during the Time War and why/how it was locked!!!!!!!

  • Mark

    Without the continuity its just not Dr Who. Making an out-of-continuity film is completely pointless. It’s removing one of the major components that makes the show fun.

    • Marian Frae

      “A man is the sum of his memories, a Timelord even more so.” –The Doctor
      Take away the show’s continuity, you take away his memories. You take away his memories, you take away the man. You take away the man, you have a different character. You have John Smith LARPing his dreams.

      In other words: I agree.

  • Mark

    If they’re going to do a film, they should do one about the Eighth Doctor and the Time War and finish it with him regenerating into the Ninth Doctor. A movie to connect the original series to the new series would be something worth seeing, and with a cinematic film’s budget, it could really do justice to the Time War.

    • Jamie

      I was just thinking the exact same thing. McGann or Eccleston and the Time War or nothing. It just makes sense.

      But unfortunately the article implies a completely different (and unnecessary) direction.

    • James

      Yeah! McGuann should be in this and it should be about the beginning of the Time War where Davro’s ship fell into the jaws of the nightmare child and the doctor tried to save him.

  • Brian

    Oh please. Write something original, if you can manage it, and leave the Doctor alone!

  • Kathy

    My husband has been a fan since the beginning! He will be excited that there might be a movie, but…..if it has nothing to do with the Who universe, with continuity of storyline and even actors, then they seriously need to reconsider. The other two movies ignored some of the basic charm of the many series over the last 50 years! And neither was well received. The biggest audience would be current show fans. Why ignore them to make a “hollywood” rip-off? Be careful……

  • Mr.Rich316

    2-3 years???I think we’ve found Daniel Radcliff’s next franchise…Harry Potter as The Doctor. Seriously, must be written by Moffat or Davies. Might I suggest a little Martha Jones in the flick?

  • The Doctor

    Hmmm as a long term Dr Who fan I love the idea of a big screen adaptation of the series – however trying to appease American audiences or neglect 49 years of history will be its utter downfall.

    The show already has a massive following, young, old and from many countries – tamper with it too much and you risk everything ha ha

    Let’s not do a Harry Potter on this zzzzz

  • ladycatherine

    I don’t know whether anyone is actually concerned with my opinion or not, BUT …

    Make it classic! I’m not saying it has to be Old Who, just Good Who. The Christopher Eccelston years were fantastic, and the David Tennant years were brilliant. Matt Smith is good, but his seasons have lacked something. (Maybe a really clever catchphrase?)

    I <3 <3 River Song. I think it would be wonderful to hear more about her. Ditto on the Doctor's Daughter, Jenny. And the incorrigible Lauren Cooper. ;)

    And please, not Daniel Radcliffe. Alan Rickman, maybe. Laurence Fox? Or Benedict Cumberbatch :D If you can tear him away from Baker Street long enough.

    OOOOOOH. OR even BETTER YET: let Sherlock and the Doctor meet. PLEASE. Get Tennant and Cumberbatch in together, to solve the world's problems with a sonic screwdriver and a skull. Yes? Moffat and Gatiss should have a lot of fun with that! And if you need help writing it, let me know. If inconvenient, I will come anyway.

    Can't wait! :D

  • Nolan

    As much as i respect Yates and what he did with Harry Potter. This makes me nervous. and the fact that he has never seen an episode of Doctor Who makes me even more nervous. I am a Director and an working on a Doctor Who Fan Series (3 episode story arch) which keep continuity but is an alernate 11th doctor. (Look us up on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/pages/Doctor-Who-Fan-Series/247123408640308 )

    We need someone who Knows and Loves Doctor who to direct. I wish i could. I am a Film Student, and have a HUGE love for Doctor Who. I know more about the Doctor Who universe than Star Wars, and i was a huge Star Wars fan growing up. I really dont know about a Doctor Who Movie. i dont want it to be like Superman returns… this news makes me nervous.

    • Helen

      It’s not Yates who’s never seen an episode, it’s the writer of the article. He finishes quoting Yates and then says that HE has never seen an episode but thinks Who fans should be excited about having a talented director on board.

  • Andrew Falconer

    Because Yates was the Harry Potter director, they will have Daniel Radcliffe doing his version of David Tennant as the Doctor.

    It would be great if somebody would make a Doctor Who movie series that would make sense of the 8th Doctor.

  • Thomas Nilsen

    Ok it’s time for Sean Pertwee to finally step into the ring and follow in his father’s footsteps as the Doctor!

  • Sarah

    It’s completely silly to attempt a movie that’s non-canon at this point. Who’s going to go see it?

  • Ashley

    No, this is absolutely ridiculous. You want to make a movie, fine, but don’t stray off from the show, that makes absolutely NO sense. The ONLY way this would work is if the bring back on of the previous Doctors, or the current Doctor, and have it be a story we never saw in the show.

    Using a different actor gives the Doctor an extra regeneration that breaks the time span of a Time Lords life.

    This whole movie is a shit idea.

  • Pingback: Warner Bros. Wants David Yates to Direct THE IMITATION GAME()

  • Sean

    I would love to see the story of how The Doctor started! Back when he stole the TARDIS, the Time War, more of his life on Gallifrey, etc. Or maybe redo the first series (from 1963) whose episodes were lost and will never be seen again!

    • Joy

      Oooo, I like the idea of using lost eps as fodder for the big-screen treatment! It’d be a way to honor the classic series, allow fans to see an iteration of those lost stories, and yet bring Doctor Who to a whole new audience.

      I mean, as much as people hate on the Will Smith “Wild Wild West,” if it weren’t for that movie, I would never have discovered the masterpiece that was the TV series. So if making a Doctor Who movie brings new fans in to the series, I am ALL for that!

    • dan

      Sean, I like your idea! I would love to see some of the old, missing stories. Knowing more about the time-war would be cool. And on a side note… during the time-war, was e-space locked away too? I’d like to see Romana come back…

      • Ethan

        Great idea. As for Romana, she’s no longer in e-space. She escaped some time ago and became President of the High Council of the Time Lords on Gallifrey.

      • Mikaal

        As far as canon is concerned, Romana is still exploring E-Space with a K-9 unit.

  • Joy

    I LOVED what David Yates did for the Harry Potter franchise, so he’s one of the very few directors I would trust to make a big-screen treatment of Doctor Who.

    I nominate Neil Gaiman as head writer (if they have more than one writer).

    And Tom Hiddleston should play the Doctor. :-D

  • Dana


  • Guest

    NO! I’m so annoyed they’re doing this! I’m a die hard fan. Though a movie sounds appealing it will probably ruin the show even though “it wont follow the show”. I hope they don’t do it. Doctor who was made to be a show and it should stay that way.

  • Daisy Adair


    ><# Yates can take his stupid ideas and shove it.
    I for one am not interested in seeing some idiot who obviously
    doesn't give a damn about Doctor Who make a crappy movie
    and pretend it's Doctor Who.

  • Brandon

    I would love to see a Doctor Who movie and to be honest I don’t mind if the movie isn’t canon because the movie will bring new fans to the TV series.

  • Anthony Adams

    “It’s a smart move because you don’t risk angering fans of the TV series, or forcing newcomers to catch up with a show that’s been on and off and back on the air from 1963 to 1989 and rebooted in 2005.”

    That quote alone is enough to anger fans and not following the current continuity is just dumb. David Yates needs to realize that the only ones who will see a Doctor Who film are Doctor Who fans. This is just as ridiculous as doing a new Buffy movie without any of the television cast. And we all know what people thought of that idea.

    We as fans need to let the BBC know that we don’t want any feature-film version of Doctor Who that doesn’t follow continuity or doesn’t include a Doctor that fans know.

  • Sara

    There’s a 1% chance that this movie will be good. David Yates ripped Harry Potter to shreds and now he wants to do the same with The Doctor. The only way this could be good would be if he appealed to both the current fans and people who have never seen it before. The only way to do that would be to recreate the beginning of the Doctor. Still, the fact that there will be a Doctor Who movie makes me want to scream with anticipation. It has potential to be an amazing movie but will most likely disappoint. Either way, I will definitely be first in line at the box office. I’m just not patient enough to wait two years.

  • Pingback: Who Will Make a Who Movie? | VidTalk()

  • Kas

    Why go with the series and keep going younger? Get a really good, experienced actor to get all the nuances of the Doctor right, because it really is going to be a tricky part.

  • storyidea

    A story idea, since the doctor is known to so many people, a group decides to steal his dna and merge it with their own.

    Each member gains the knowledge and power of the doctor, to a lesser degree, they then separate changing time and events in a non-sequential way heading towards a master plan.

  • Matt

    Its implied that yates thinks he can capture fans but true die hard fans are going to ignore any movie that doesnt maintain some sort of continuity of the show. We watch it for the story that has panned out for decades. Some half assed movie that looses the long running story elements and gives us, as fans no value to the story we follow, will turn us away. Either do the movie on a subject mentioned in the show, but never seen (ex: timewar) or dont do the movie at all. If theres no connection to the story I wont see the movie so as not to tarnish the conplicated sequence of events in the show i love so much. The only story id be interested in would be one that expounds on those events. Damn you Yates for trying to mess with perfection! .Terrible!

  • Lord Rassilon

    I don’t think Yates and Tranter realise what a sewage works worth of shinola they are going to unlease if they get this wrong. Hell hath no fury like a Whovian scorned, and there are a lot of Whovians out there across the whole world . The story HAS to fit into the established existing Who-niverse history so I do not like the sound of Yate’s quote “It needs quite a radical transformation to take it into the bigger arena….” one little bit.
    One of the most impressive things I saw at the cinema was when they trailed David Tennants third season in cinemas just prior to it airing on BBC 1. To see the interior of the Tardis up on the big screen was “fantastic.”
    I personnaly I agree with a previous poster who suggested a film set around the events of the time war, there is loads of scope there for all the Doctors enemy’s to make an appearance, Hollywood style set piece space battles and an ending that finishes with a timelock so nobody remembers anything except the Doctor, who continues on his travels into the sunset. With maybe both Paul McGann and possibly even a brief cameo from Christopher Ecclestone (Both big screen actors) for the post-McGann regeneration scene just to add completeness to the existing Who-niverse timeline. And as RTD is now establishing himself out in LA maybe he could be approached to write the screenplay. Of course this is all a pipe dream, but a darn good one surely any Whovian must agree. “Allons-y”

  • Ariadne

    I think this is a bad idea. Unless they do it correctly. Call in Russel T Davies, Steven Moffat, Neil Gaiman, and other writers from the TV series so it doesn’t look like they decided to do a fanfiction. I hope Yates has seen Doctor Who and the writers he gets for the movie. Either way it’s going to be a huge flop, or not be bad.

    • Aaron Walden

      Wow, Neil Gaiman, that is like a nerds wet dream come true… That man can write AND knows film work! They should just let him go wild on it, you can’t go wrong there!!

  • Matthew

    A movie isn’t necessarily a bad idea, but it should tie into the show. This “start from scratch” stuff is BS. A comic on the subject: http://www.cinemabums.com/?p=174

  • Jeff

    Dear God no. The Americans will ruin it. Even American Dr Who fans want it “British”. I can just see it now some American Hunk from the Twikight films or worse they’ll go all PC and have an ethnic or female (or both) Doctor. (And that is no way meant to be racist or sexist – remember it was an American Film exec who said, when casting for the Thunderbirds movie, suggested that one of the Tracey brothers be black). And why not follow canon? It’s not like you are going to attract many non-Who fans so make it for the audience it already has in Britain, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (to name a few). This is a really, really bad idea.

  • Ari

    This is going to be like the time M. Night Shyamalan tried to make a movie based on Avatar: The Last Airbender, isn’t it?
    The Last Airbender was an insult to the fans of AtLA. I don’t want the same thing to happen to Doctor Who.

  • Montgomery

    Keep the Americans OUT. The American influence on the last Torchwood was a serious drawback.They will probably make a “reality” show where want to be actors tryout for the part of the companion, complete with phone in voting.

    • Candy

      They reality casting thing as actually a British thing; The Sound of Music, Oliver, Joseph and the amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat . . .

      The only show I can recall us Americans having like that was for Grease and it was overseen by the English producer.

      • Helen


  • Maz

    Having grown up with Doctor Who and now working in tv I really don’t see what all the fuss is about. Doctor Who was mildly entertaining when I was 8 and Tom Baker was the Doctor, but looking back it has always been a crappy, low budget, amateur dramatic type of show. I can’t believe people seriously want to see a film with David Tennant in it???? The last series of Doctor Who was low budget BBC crap.

  • s-y-f-l

    The thing is that i don’t want to see a remake, i would like to see a sequel or a prequel of the show.

  • Candy

    Okay, so Im an American and completely obsessed with Doctor Who. I don’t care where the actor they choose hails from just so long as they can do a perfect british accent and are plenty capable of being absolutely mad.

    As for as the story line not adhering strictly to the series(old and new alike) it may not be all that bad, fifty years of ‘lore is a lot to bring to an audience that has absolutely no familiarity with the Whoverse. And lets face it, if we have a prayer of ever seeing this movie made the people in charge are going to have to figure out how to get a bigger audience than just us few.

    Plot wise they could always pull a Star Trek and shift the beginning of the story; say, start in Gallafray and maybe the time war doesn’t get sealed. That way they get to have fresh material and we get new worlds to watch the Doctor explore.

  • Aaron Walden


    But I digress… I actually think Yates has the eye for good visuals but his story telling abilities leave a whole Hell of a lot to be desired! He destroyed the last 2 Potter films and made a mess of 5 & 6 by not being fully read up on the stories and not being able to make them flow one to the other. Writers are integral to the plot and dialogue yes, but the director needs to be able to hold it all together make sure he has a fluid/cohesive story that translates well to audiences In this area Yates is an idiot and I fear he will screw up one of the most thought provoking and cerebral tales ever conceived in the realm of entertainment. That being said I have always dreamed of a Doctor Who movie on the big screen in an epic form, so if it is done well enough I am for it. Yates better get his mess together quick!!

    • Candy

      I agree with you on the Yates thing, all the brilliance of Rowlings eye for detail was wasted.

      But, let me tell you that trying to find someone to talk to about Doctor Who in Texas, is damn near impossible.

      All a girl wants is someone to curl up with and watch yet another failed Dalek invasion.

  • Rocky

    So, this would be a sequel for the Peter Cushing Dr. Who movies, or do we pretend those never happened?

  • Edd Watling

    I think David Yates is a great director, and I am a colossal Doctor Who fan. A movie woud be fine, if it was still connected to the TV series, but completely rebooting it is a nonsense idea. Doctor Who has a big enough fanbase that a new movie isn’t going to alienate loads of viewers, so why does it need to be reinvented at all. Either continue the TV series on the big screen, or don’t bother at all

  • Pingback: David Yates führt Regie beim “Doctor Who”-Film – Movieparasite()

  • djcati

    Oh, you’re trolling! Now I get it!

  • Mike Topham

    A Hollywood version of DR.Who good god no It’ll be Like setting a The Lone Ranger in the Westmildands with Tonto from Bradford.

  • Cookie

    Hugh Laurie as The Doctor…

  • Pete S

    If the BBC are involved then there is a very good chance that continuity will remain.

    Matt Smith is likely to end his tenure around the 50th anniversary celebrations as predicted, setting up the regeneration and straight into filming of the movie. If this happens then a Dr Who movie is a great idea.

    Depending on it’s success, the series may continue or may be rested for a bit, while sequels are made. I would like to see Moffat and Russel T Davies have some input, they deserve that chance. A new actor should play the 12th doctor, to move the character forward with a large budget to play with. If done right, this will be great!

  • Rubix

    This sounds like a good way to get people into the doctor who series, i just hope he doesn’t butcher it. Also David Tennant is amazing, and though i’d love to see him other work he should NOT be in this film.

    Good luck to Yates, looking forward to seeing his work

  • zydrate13

    I’m excited yet terrified… I would like to see Craig Ferguson thrown in as the doctor. I think he would make a fantastic doctor. If we r going to recycle a companion I would hope it to be rose. If not a completly new companion. I pray the tardis remains the same Nd the daleks too. And cassandra would be an awesome character to revisit. I miss her Haha. As for hates. I think I could be happy with him. Atleast its not like the early 2000s when Paul w.s. Anderson. Was going to addapt it. He would ha f*cked it up so bad.

  • Maggie

    If they feel they need to depart from the TV series then I hope they do something with the Doctor’s past. There is so much territory there that could be covered with the first incarnation of the Doctor. He lived to be a very old man, and you could get a younger actor to play him convincingly. A good script, perhaps about the Doctor’s fist encounter with Earth would be amazing, of course that would cut out the Daleks for the film, but to be honest as much as I love the Daleks, it is really hard to get them right. That’s what I would want anyway, and it would could stay within the continuity. It would be nice to see a film that showed how the Doctor started becoming the Doctor we know today. What eventually led him to grab Susan and leave Gallifrey? We all know something happened, but what? A good script about that would draw in people, or at least me.

  • Maggie

    I would like to see a story about the first doctor. The Doctor lived to be a very old man before regenerating for the first time, and there is so much territory there that could be exploited. There would be no need to have Susan, because he would be younger, no daleks, because he hasn’t met them yet, but you could create something new, and fresh and still keep in the continuity.
    It would be good to see the young timelord visiting Earth then stepping out of his way to save Earth for the very first time. The Timelords could be part of it, and of course a younger version of the master (possible villian?). It is a dream, but I would watch if it is done well.

  • Katherine

    So you couldn’t spare 40 minutes to watch an episode before writing this? Really?

    And it’s not going to relate to the series (ahem, the canon of the subject matter) at all?

    Nor will it share the writers, the cast, or anything of the years and years of wonderful work that have gone into making the rebooted show such a success?

    So, basically, they’re taking something popular, throwing money at it and holding the creative talent responsible for it back, and churning out something that might possibly have something to do with some guy in a blue box?

    We are not amused.

    Also, Harry Potter wasn’t that great.

    Bring on the lynch mob! ;)

  • Greg M

    If they want to do a big budget movie, it can be done and still make the fans happy. Bring back Eccleston and do a movie about the time war.

  • Katherine

    I do, however, completely agree with Maggie about how it could be a sort of prequel to the original series.

    Yes. That would be BRILLIANT.

  • Greg M

    If they want to do a big budget movie, there is a way to do it and still be true to the series. Bring back Eccleston and base the movie on the unseen Time Wars. There should be a lot they could do there on a galactic scale.

    • Jillian

      Exactly. That would make the most sense, and I would love to see Eccleston return as the doctor. That would keep it familiar enough that fans would enjoy it, open enough that others could watch it, and fantastic enough that the others watching it would want to become fans of the series.

  • JYM


    Seriously, this article has given me high blood pressure.. I need a drink.

  • Jillian

    Somewhere up in the comments, someone mentioned setting during the Time War, and I think that would be a fantastic idea. It would allow them a lot of room to work, as the time war is a large grey area between the two series. It would let them take it in a different direction, but still stay in line with the series. If they don’t stay in line with the series at all, what is the point of calling it Doctor Who?

    Also, someone else stated that Benedict Cumberbatch would be a good choice for the doctor. I think that he might be as well. I would be happy to see him try his hand as the doctor, but only after he finishes with BBC’s Sherlock, that show would not be worth watching without him. (Besides, how do you explain why Sherlock Holmes is suddenly a different person? He doesn’t regenerate)

  • appleapple

    While I think Yates is a heck of a lot better than M. Night, I must ask he RESPECT THE SOURCE MATERIAL. You won’t have a movie without it. And if the 8th Doctor can be canon, you have to realize it’s not that hard to keep canon. Policebox and a man who regenerates, throw in a couple throwaway lines referencing the old stuff no new viewers will notice, that’s all you need really.

  • Jinxadorah

    I have been scanning the comments left thus far, and I have to agree with a few of you… IF this movie is to be made, it should give some backstory: like the Time War. This allows for the possibility of a human companion and/or an alien companion. It will also allow for Christopher Eccelston to return (since he is my favourite Doctor this is a win/win for me). It doesn’t have to be all about the rebooted series’ (though they are wonderful and have done a FANTASTIC job)… none of the same companions will be there (which sadly means no Jack, Rose, Martha, Donna, etc, but that’s OK), so there is no need for continuity with them. This film could be a wonderful opportunity to bring new folks into the fold. My only hesitation comes from the pain I still feel from Firefly becoming Serenity on the big screen. A bigger budget and Hollywood fingers usually means that the heart and soul of the film/story/original concept is placed into a blender and frapped until even the die-hards hate it.

    To make this film a success Yates and crew MUST listen to us, the fans. It must have those elements of childhood fears, grown-up worries, and loads of whimsy… not to mention Daleks!

    As for casting… I mentioned already that I feel they should explore Nine a bit more… so bring back Christopher Eccelston! If the Master is involved, he should be portrayed by James Frain (brilliant in True Blood season 3). Though, as I think about it, he had already or was about to hide himself using the Chameleon circuit… so that might not be plausible. No matter what, it should remain British. I am American… I don’t want to see Taylor Lautner or Miley Cyrus (I know I am being silly with those choices, but still) as a companion. And I don’t care how good an accent someone can do… keep it real!

  • Kevin Gravitt

    I vote for a prequel, showing the Dr. and his granddaughter starting on Gallafray, stealing the tardis, why he left, etc. But this time with better audio, color at least but film would be nice too, and a budget.

  • Tarek

    Shia Laboeuf as the Dr Who

  • Amy

    Awesome!!!!! I’m a little disappointed that it will have nothing to do with show continuity, but I’m still excited!!! They did something similar back in the 60′s with Dalek’s Invasion Earth, so I’m just excited to see where they take it.

  • Jayne1955

    Don’t do it! I’ve been watching since Patrick Troughton, and I’m telling you all of the theatre Doctor Who films SUCKED. No offense to Peter Cushing who was a great actor, but they were awful. Save yourself a lot of grief. Do NOT do it.

  • Lynn Keller

    Yates has two examples from which to learn:
    1) The Star Trek reboot works because it maintains an almost worshipful respect for the original franchise. The stories can branch out into new directions while still retaining all the flavor and wonderful elements of the ’60s series.
    2) The James Bond reboot, on the other hand, retained NONE of the elements that made the franchise unique. The new Bond could be dropped into any spy film, nothing special, just another goon with a gun. The magic was murdered.

  • Jamie

    I think Robert Downey Jr would make a good Doctor.

  • Alex

    The only way i can see this working is if they did a movie about what happend when the doctor was a little child on gallifrey. I would love to see that. Like he and Koschei going on adventurs on gallifrey.

  • Pingback: New ‘Dragon Tattoo’ footage released; Adele is ‘on the mend’ | tatoo.co.za()

  • Pingback: On Doctor Who on the Silver Screen (or not) | aaronclayton.net()

  • Free Flash Games Unlimeted Online Arcade Gaming

    Great work! This is the type of information that are supposed to be shared around the internet. Disgrace on the search engines for no longer positioning this post upper! Come on over and consult with my website . Thanks =)

  • compro vinos

    Fantastic site. Plenty of useful information here. I am sending it to a few pals ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks to your effort!

  • Guest

    I don’t think this thing is a good idea. I didn’t like this guy’s adaptation of the Harry Potter books. Although I’d like a movie following the Master maybe.

  • novini posledni

    Definitely consider that that you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be at the net the simplest factor to take into account of. I say to you, I certainly get irked at the same time as folks think about concerns that they just do not understand about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as neatly as defined out the entire thing without having side-effects , other folks can take a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thanks

  • Pingback: 3 Reasons to Not Watch Doctor Who | Two to a Urinal()