
The first full trailer for “The Twilight Saga: New Moon” is frustrating. It’s frustrating because if you didn’t pay attention to any of the narrative stuff and just turned the sound off, you’d have a visually impressive film. Director Chris Weitz and cinematographer Javier Aguirresarobe (who also shot John Hillcoat’s “The Road” which hits theatres five days later so as far as DP work goes, that’s a fun juxtaposition) have made a film that completely blows away Catherine Hardwicke’s all-blue-filter, all-the-time style of the first “Twilight” film.
But then there’s the story and you have a girl who has become so dependent on a boy that instead of just having normal teenage sadness about a break-up, she makes attempts at suicide through reckless behavior. What’s worse is that as the trailer continues the messages appears to be, “Don’t be a strong, independent woman,” as much as it’s, “My boyfriend needs me and I have to save him or else I’ll be lonely and weak again!” But I’m sure that the “Twilight” fans have ignored all my commentary and skipped straight to the trailer after the jump. “The Twilight Saga: New Moon” opens and feminism suffers on November 20th.

God help me, it does look “watchable”.
God help me, it does look “watchable”.
This movie just looks awfull .I know that there are many fans of this series but the first part was really bad and I thought they would make a good second movie but it just looks badder than the first one too .I mean the story and the acting I know there lots of fans and this movie will go hit but still will be counted as bad movie.
This movie just looks awfull .I know that there are many fans of this series but the first part was really bad and I thought they would make a good second movie but it just looks badder than the first one too .I mean the story and the acting I know there lots of fans and this movie will go hit but still will be counted as bad movie.
One, she never tries to commit suicide, only tries to experience her true love. But, I suspect that is a concept beyond you.
Two, yes she becomes very emotionally attached to Edward. That is what people do. But not dependent. In the books she has a job to earn money for college, she refuses his money at every turn.
Three, she is not a masochist. It hurts to have love ripped away. Of course she wants to fix it. But your not getting the point. She goes to save him, not to save herself. Read the books.
One, she never tries to commit suicide, only tries to experience her true love. But, I suspect that is a concept beyond you.
Two, yes she becomes very emotionally attached to Edward. That is what people do. But not dependent. In the books she has a job to earn money for college, she refuses his money at every turn.
Three, she is not a masochist. It hurts to have love ripped away. Of course she wants to fix it. But your not getting the point. She goes to save him, not to save herself. Read the books.
There movie is very frustrating as its too brief. im not satisfied with it. it’s a great story but it doesnt show very well in the movie
There movie is very frustrating as its too brief. im not satisfied with it. it’s a great story but it doesnt show very well in the movie