THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Secret Catwoman Poster Revealed
New Images from THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN
Josh Brolin Talks MEN IN BLACK 3, GANGSTER SQUAD, OLDBOY, LABOR DAY and THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME
Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone Talk THE TOMB, THE EXPENDABLES 2, Their Careers and “Male Pattern Badness”
THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Set Visit Preview and 4 Awesome New Posters!INVICTUS Review
by Matt Goldberg Posted:December 11th, 2009 at 1:10 am
|
|
 |
|
There’s technically nothing wrong with Invictus. Clint Eastwood’s direction is smart, Morgan Freeman gives a fantastic performance as Nelson Mandela, the pacing is steady, the script is well written, and it has a straightforward moral message about the power of forgiveness. But there’s not much you can do with the film after you see it. Invictus never crosses that line where you have to think about the movie, consider its themes, or even feel like cheering. It gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling for two hours and then you’re done.
If Nelson Mandela were Catholic, he would be known as Saint Mandela. Incarcerated for 27 years, Mandela was elected President of South Africa in 1994 following his release from prison in 1990. However, his election and the breaking of apartheid caused a major political and cultural shift where the majority black population finally came into power after years of oppression by the white minority. Extreme tension obviously continued to exist between the two races but Mandela seeks to break the cycle of conflict through forgiveness, even if it means upsetting his supporters. The film picks up shortly after Mandela’s election as he tries to find a way to inspire all South Africans and ease the enmity between whites and blacks in his country.
Mandela’s cultural plan is simple but quite ingenious: He wants the South African rugby team the Springboks to win the 1995 Rugby World Cup even though they’re an awful team. Led by Francois Pienaar (Matt Damon), a good man and a committed captain, Mandela believes the success of the Springboks can provide a cultural connection between the races since sports are a simple competition with nothing to lose but can provide a shared rallying point when a team is winning (fair-weather fans!). It’s not a bad plan to have South Africans find a common, albeit simple, goal despite their intense dislike of each other caused by decades of strife. Thankfully, while Eastwood shows Mandela’s commitment to encouraging the Boks, he makes sure to show the leader working on matters of the state so the audience doesn’t think that Mandela dropped everything to watch sports.
Eastwood’s direction in Invictus is more restrained than in previous films as he turns his focus to conveying the racial conflict and explaining a sport that is foreign to most Americans (that will happen when other countries describe rugby as “American football but not for pussies,” because that’s the way to get Americans interested in your sport), but without getting bogged down in a history lesson or a breakdown of the intricacies of rugby. He accomplishes his goals by providing visual cues where we get a basic understanding of the deep-seated enmity among South Africans and a rough sense of how rugby is played. It’s an impressive feat of editing and visual storytelling.
Of course, it’s Freeman who will get the most attention as all famous actors do when portraying an icon. The best and the worst aspect of Freeman’s performance is its warmth and kindness. You can understand Mandela’s power to inspire and marvel at his gracious attitude towards both his supporters and detractors. At the same time, Anthony Peckham’s script believes it humanizes Mandela because he misses his family and works himself to the point of exhaustion. Unfortunately, you don’t humanize a character by making him or her too saintly. While Mandela’s story is essentially a hagiography, at least it has a strong message about forgiveness, which I think is a trait in short supply these days as holding a grudge is valued as a strength. I wish Matt Damon’s story had a point as well, but Pienaar has no character arc. He starts off apolitical and deeply admires Mandela by the end of the movie. It’s barely a transformation and the role is a waste of Damon’s considerable talent.
Invictus comes out to less than the sum of its parts. Never an awful movie, it promotes important values like unity, humility, and compassion, and I agree that those values are important and we should all strive to incorporate them into our daily lives. Watching characters embody those values feels good in the same way a warm bath feels good or reading a book on a rainy Sunday afternoon feels good. But it doesn’t make for an interesting movie and Invictus, unlike Mandela’s gambit with the Springboks, fails to inspire.
Rating —– B minus
Please Like Collider on Facebook
|
|
|
|
I agree 100%! Soooo disappointing.
I agree 100%! Soooo disappointing.
Wonderful movie. This is how it happened and the characters are true to how they were. Don’t expect a Holloywood fantasy script. Freeman and Damon portrayed the characters almost 100% true. I was there, I experienced it firsthand.
Wonderful movie. This is how it happened and the characters are true to how they were. Don’t expect a Holloywood fantasy script. Freeman and Damon portrayed the characters almost 100% true. I was there, I experienced it firsthand.
Superb movie. As a South African living not far from Ellis Park at the time, I remember that amazing day like yesterday, and always will. It was a defining moment for our country and this film captures the spirit of it.
Superb movie. As a South African living not far from Ellis Park at the time, I remember that amazing day like yesterday, and always will. It was a defining moment for our country and this film captures the spirit of it.
The movie is sadly flawed. Mandela never gave the captain “Invictus” – he gave him this….. a much better choice for the situation!
From “The Man in the Arena” speech by Theodore Roosevelt, in France, 1910:
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.
Why did the movie makers have to change this important part of history?
The movie is sadly flawed. Mandela never gave the captain “Invictus” – he gave him this….. a much better choice for the situation!
From “The Man in the Arena” speech by Theodore Roosevelt, in France, 1910:
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.
Why did the movie makers have to change this important part of history?
For another view point of this movie check out the review at http://www.neocritic.com/?p=214
For another view point of this movie check out the review at http://www.neocritic.com/?p=214
Hi E Duke
Just wondering where the source of this info comes from as it isn't mentioned at all in Peter Carlin's book but Invictus is included in the front of the book for effect.