J.J. Abrams Talks About the Status of STAR TREK 2 and His Thoughts on MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: GHOST PROTOCOL

by     Posted: August 3rd, 2011 at 10:54 pm

slice_jj_abrams_01

After going to Houston to pick up his son, who just returned from camp in Costa Rica, the hardest working man in show business, J.J. Abrams, actually made his way to the TCA Press Tour party for CBS/The CW/Showtime to support the upcoming CBS drama Person of Interest, premiering on September 22nd and starring Jim Caviezel and Michael Emerson. While we will run that portion of the interview closer to the show’s premiere, we did want to post the update he gave on the status of Star Trek 2 and his thoughts on Mission Impossible – Ghost Protocol.

According to J.J. Abrams, they’re totally focused on getting all of the important elements together for Star Trek 2 –  including the story, the characters, the cast and crew, and the audience – before they worry about pre-production, locations, and the wardrobe and visual effects budgets. He also said that Paramount has been very supportive because everyone involved just wants the movie to be as good as possible, and that he won’t officially decide about signing on as director until everything is in place. In regard to Mission Impossible, he shared some insight about Brad Bird as a director, and what it’s like to work with someone like Tom Cruise, who insists on doing all of his own stunts. Check out what he had to say after the jump:

J.J. Abrams imageQuestion: Are you back focused on Star Trek 2 now?

J.J. ABRAMS: Yeah. There have been a lot of things that we’ve been working on, a lot of important elements that we just know we need to really nail down and solve. Once you say, “We’re ready to go, but we don’t have a finished script yet,” or “I’m directing the thing and here’s the release date, but we don’t have a finished script,” what starts to happen – and I’ve seen this happen with a lot of friends of mine – is that you’re suddenly in production on a movie that they’re thinking, “Oh my god, we weren’t really ready. We thought we’d get it done in time, but we didn’t.” So, while we have a moment to say, “Let’s get the important things figured out,” then all the pre-production stuff will come. But, I just want to make sure that we’re putting the story and the characters, the cast and the crew, and most importantly the audience, first before we start talking about exactly which locations we’re going to be shooting at and what the wardrobe and visual effects budgets are. It just seems important that we get the important stuff right first.

Was it a difficult conversation or an easy one, given your history with them, to say to Paramount, “We’re not going to make that summer release date because it would compromise the movie ”?

ABRAMS: They so get it. All they care about – and I had this discussion very recently with Rob Moore – is that the movie be good. No one wants to take a step backwards. They’ve been great.

Have you officially signed on as director?

ABRAMS: No. But, we’re working very hard on it and hopefully we’ll have something to talk about soon.

tom-cruise-paula-patton-mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-movie-imageWhen you have to make shifts like that, how difficult is it to juggle the schedules of such a big cast?

ABRAMS: The fact is that we never booked them, so it’s not like we’re unbooking them and switching and cancelling lunch dates. They all understand. They want to be in a good movie as well.

As producer, what are your thoughts on Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol and Brad Bird as the director? Is it the best one in the series?

ABRAMS: I think it’s the best one of the series. I do. First of all, you’ve never seen a live action Brad Bird movie, and yet when you watch it, you go, “This is a Brad Bird movie.” You realize you’ve been watching Brad Bird films that just happen to be animated. It’s really fun. It’s got a fun intensity to it, and that’s Brad. It’s the biggest one, by far, in terms of the stuff that happens in it. Also, there are other things like a portion of it was shot in IMAX and there’s a sequence on the tallest building in the world, the Burj in Dubai, where Tom Cruise did five days worth of wire work outside the building that is so insane, you cannot believe the insurance company let him do it. When you see it on IMAX, it’s terrifying. It’s crazy, what he did. It really is unbelievable. It’s weird to be in meetings with him and think, “That dude was running down the outside of the building!” I’m talking to him, he’s in my office, and he did that. It’s weird. It’s like talking to Buzz Aldrin. You’re like, “That dude was on the moon!”

You could have been the guy who killed Tom Cruise.

ABRAMS: Well, you’re always afraid of that ‘cause Tom wants to do every stunt. But then, when he does it, you realize he can.




Please Like Collider on Facebook

Comments:

Anonymous Comments: (85 Responses)

  1. Ghost Protocol actually looks kind of good as an action movie.

    Part 3 was a miscalculation on Abrams part with its clandestine story that pretty much revealed nothing. The action was few and far between as well.

    It appears the franchise is moving more towards action than espionage but from what we have seen it looks like they are trying their damndest to keep the franchise going.

    Still would like to see Abrams focus on Star Trek for God sake. I understand they want to do it right but next to LOST, STAR TREK, is easily his most recognizable and successful vehicle.

  2. wow! he just said that his MI movie is inferior to Bird(and that was a damn good film). is JJ being to kind, or is Brad Bird really a born director? i can’t wait to see.

    • I thought it wasn’t even a question brad bird was a born director after the iron giant, the incredibles and ratatouille. In fact I’d take it a step farther and say he was a born writer/director. He works hard at it.

      • sorry, i chose the wrong word. i meant it as a “born director” where he can direct live action movies as good as his animated ones, and that the genre or art form does not matter because he IS a born director. and yes, i would call him a born writer/director. incredibles, and especially Ratatouille are as well written as a movie can be.

    • Bird is a damned good director, i agree. but the shocking part is that Abrams, who just did the previous installment just proclaimed the new film, the one he didn’t direct(but did produce), a better film. he would have had a little ego in there and say that “one of the best”(therefore elevating Bird’s work, and keeping the high status of his directed film), but he just said that it is THE BEST. period. shocking for me. and what a humble thing to say by JJ. it must be THAT good. i can’t wait for it.

  3. I hope they include Lady Gaga in the sequel as a singer with dark connections to the villains. With her futuristic music and style, she would fit right in.

    I’d like to see Kirk, Spock and McCoy go undercover to a concert of hers on a distant planet like with Diva Plavalaguna in The Fifth Element (1997). When she sings Bad Romance, Paparazzi, Poker Face or Just Dance, her show could be raided by many henchmen who have a thunderous phaser fight with Kirk, Spock and McCoy like the intense post-bank heist gunfight in Heat (1995).

  4. • The Orion Syndicate as the villains
    • Larger all-star cast as well as many cameos including by William Shatner
    • More planets
    • Larger space battles with more starships
    • Kirk having better fighting skills
    • Kirk having several human love interests played by Hollywood’s most beautiful young actresses
    • No cut scenes
    • The Star Trek theme music from the Insurrection end credits used at the end

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Security Code:

Features

IndieClick Film Network

Click Here