STRANGER THAN FICTION Writer Zach Helm to Pen JUMANJI Remake

by     Posted: December 7th, 2012 at 7:07 am

zach-helm-jumanji-slice

As we reported earlier this year, Sony Pictures is looking to remake their 1995 hit film, Jumanji.  For those unfamiliar with the original Robin Williams flick, the story (based on a 1981 illustrated children’s book) focuses on two adults and a pair of siblings who must play through the eponymous magical board game, which keeps creating horrific jungle conditions in the real-world every time someone makes a new move or tries to cheat.  According to Heat Vision, Sony has hired Stranger Than Fiction writer Zach Helm to pen the remake.

There are no details on how the remake will differ from the original, but Helm is a smart choice for the magical realism of Jumanji.  In addition to Stranger Than Fiction, he also wrote and directed Mr. Magorium’s Wonder Emporium, and did a rewrite on the upcoming remake of The Secret Life of Walter Mitty starring Ben Stiller.  Hit the jump to check out the trailer for Jumanji.

Here’s the trailer for Joe Johnston‘s Jumanji starring Robin Williams, Bonnie Hunt, and Kirsten Dunst:

jumanji-poster

 




Please Like Collider on Facebook

Comments:

Anonymous Comments: (10 Responses)

      • Funny thing is, it was actually pretty terrible. Other than Jackie Chan that is.
        1. Kung Fu is not the same as Karate.
        2. Jaden Smith can’t carry a movie with his wooden acting.

  1. I understand this. Jumanji is the sort of movie I may have revisited over the years were it not for the terribly dated CGI (to come on the heels of Jurassic Park, the animal effects were certainly not up to par with ILMs dinosaur efforts), and my hate for Robin Williams. If you’re going to remake, remake something that can be improved.

    • Not a ton of CGI in JP, and the CGI used isn’t much better than Jumanji, so no real comparison. I wished ILM and animatronics were used more often after JP.

      Anyways poor CGI is a piss reason to remake amovie that come out not even one decade ago. Why not redo the animals? I mean, that’s something that might be mildly entertaining rather than a “new” movie we’ve all seen/read a dozen times before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Security Code:

Features

IndieClick Film Network

Click Here