Set Photos of Kristen Stewart in SNOW WHITE AND THE HUNTSMAN

     September 27, 2011

The Snow White war is in full swing, with Universal and Relativity’s respective takes on the classic fairy tale currently in production barreling towards 2012 release dates, and today we’ve got set photos from the former. Some images have hit the web featuring Kristen Stewart in her nifty armor filming scenes for Snow White and the Huntsman. Stewart’s wardrobe looks identical to that which was unveiled with the first official images from the film, and is in keeping with the gritty, epic, and dark tone that director Rupert Sanders is striving for with his take on the material.

Hit the jump to see the images. The film also stars Chris Hemsworth, Charlize Theron, Sam Claflin, Noah Huntley, Nick Frost, Ray Winstone, Ian McShane, Bob Hoskins, Toby Jones, Eddie Marsan and Steven Graham. Snow White and the Huntsman opens June 1st, 2012.

Here are the set photos courtesy of Pop Sugar (via CBM):

Here’s the official synopsis for Snow White and the Huntsman:

In the epic action-adventure Snow White and the Huntsman, Kristen Stewart (Twilight) plays the only person in the land fairer than the evil queen (Oscar® winner Charlize Theron) who is out to destroy her.  But what the wicked ruler never imagined is that the young woman threatening her reign has been training in the art of war with a huntsman (Chris Hemsworth, Thor) who was dispatched to kill her.  Sam Claflin (Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides) joins the cast as the prince long enchanted by Snow White’s beauty and power.

The breathtaking new vision of the legendary tale is from Joe Roth, the producer of Alice in Wonderland, producer Sam Mercer (The Sixth Sense) and acclaimed commercial director and state-of-the-art visualist Rupert Sanders.



  • Pingback: Set Photos of Kristen Stewart in SNOW WHITE AND THE HUNTSMAN | Celebrity Gossip()

  • Sancho

    So hot to see Snow White smoking a cigarette.


  • yo

    She should be dubbed ‘the most miserable ***** in Hollywood.’
    God knows she definitely has the face to go with it.

    I second the cigarette comment.

  • lo

    lol,kinda looks like robin hood.

  • Anon

    So she smokes, bfd. So does all of young Hollywood. June 2012 can’t come fast enough.

  • teejay

    I really dont care that she smoke’s. I have a much larger concern that she is allowed to act in anything but a D.V.D.A. porn film with has been porn actors. She is the worst, and thats not only based on the fact that I hate twilight and everything about it. Its based on anything she has ever been in. She sucks so hard she gives Elton John a run for his money.

  • johnny

    Wow. Harsh much @yo. She’s even smiling in one pic. lol. Not her biggest fan, but that’s kind of far.

    As for the film…looks better than the other one. We shall wait and see

  • Matthew Weimer

    You guys are killing her too much for Twilight. Suckiness in Twilight is the result of bad source material. Kristen Stewart showed some ability in The Runaways and in Adventureland. She’s a notch above Blake Lively, Megan Fox, and company.

    • B-Dan


      • excpired

        I have to agree as well. Kristen Stewart is not nearly as bad as people make her out to be, neither are any of the other members of the Twilight cast. The material is just balls, if you need any proof of how suck balls the Twilight material is just look at how hard it was for academy award nominated/winning directors to try and bring substance to the thing, they all failed miserably. My guess is not even Chaplin could make Twilight entertaining, at least not without making a mockery of it. More than it already is of course.

    • dogg

      “Suckiness in Twilight is the result of bad source material”.

      Uh, no. Her line deliveries are laughably wooden in the Twilight flicks, to the point that that the guys chasing her vapid character look really shallow. A better actress could’ve brought SOMETHING to those crappy movies. Plus she’s the same damn character in every role she plays–”neurotic quiet girl”. Which I’m sure is a huge stretch for her.

      • B-Dan

        I quite like her being the neurotic chick. It’s a lot more real in some roles that call for it. Obviously, the Twilight stuff is a mess on all levels, no matter who is playing what, but I dont think her acting is necessarily bad.

  • Lame Duck

    Wow! Finally!!! Been waiting to see a homely looking, chain smoking, clunky armor clad, Xena wannabe Snow White!!! Bring on the sequel!

  • Rukia

    I’m still a bit miffed about the decision to put two Snow White films out so close to one another.

    Oh well. How bad could this be? Another King Arthur? Another Beowulf? These films are usually entertaining at least. And at least this is a story about a film that isn’t a remake.

  • D

    I wonder if they changed from the braid in the promo picture because of the similarity it has to Jennifer Lawrence hair style in The Hunger Games.

  • Super Dooper

    Am I missing something or is there some proof, some provable statistic that including (or worse, starring) Twilight actors helps a film’s chances at the box-office?

    Last time I checked every, and I mean EVERY, single one of their post-Twilight projects have bombed miserably at the box-office and at DVD/Blu-ray retail sales. Just this weekend we saw Taylor Lautner’s attempt at action fall on its face (no sequel for you), and Patterson couldn’t turn a million-selling book with Reese Witherspoon into anything but a complete bomb.

    It seems rather than help a film, the presence of the Twilight pack only hurts it, alienating more people than it brings in. Will Hollywood learn and hire non-Twilight actors instead of shoving these duds into every film they can?

    • Mello

      Give a break will you? I am not a fan of Robert Pattinson but, man, the movie Water of of Elephant of not a flot for a Drama and Resse be a Oscar winner was not a huge factor for the results, if you consider that a couple of months before she was a star of one of the most flop movies of the year beside other two huge stars.
      If the movie was a flop it will because of him, now it is not a flop not because of him but because of Reese. All the marketing campaign was based on him plus Reese. So… he was a huge factor for the profits. The important is the final number gave the returned that the producers were waiting. They earned money!
      You can’t talked about Kristen’s tiny movies BO results, after Twilight. The Yellow handkerchief was not being released after two years and maybe would neither have a chance of a DVD release and would go directly to TV if not for her. She was not the main actor or actress and it is a road movie, very difficult to sell. The cake Eaters ( a masterpiece in my point of view) had the same case. She was 16 and 15 in these movies and not the main character. At least they have a chance of a DVD release and I can say… They are wonderful! Also… She gave in The Cake Eaters one of the best performances that I already saw of a teenager. In Adventureland, the big name were the guys from SNL, the director and Jesse. She was the main female actor but it was an assemble piece of work. Beside there was a huge error in the promotion of the movie saying that it was from the guys from Super Bad, giving the impression that the movie would movie a Super Bad link like of movie.Huge mistake.
      So The Adventureland release had nothing with her, her fame at that point only helped the buzz around the movie. TYH and TCE only saw the light because her fame at that moment but they didn’t have distributors to back up them in more bold release.
      After came The Runaways, that had all the little promotion on TV shows and magazines go direct to the garbage when the distributor changed the release dates after the promotion and also the kind of release (to limited) one week before the actual date. During a intern war between Apparition executives. Beside this mess, the movie was R rated and a rock biopic. The first left outside all her teenage fans and the second was always a factor of restrict the type of audience. I can also say that the marketing campaign sold it as a group biopic and it was not the case. The movie was about be teenager in a world without rules and be famous in the 70′.
      For the last but not least, the movie Welcome to the Rileys was totally marketing based on her and it was totally wrong, because it had Gandolfini and a Oscar Winner (Melissa Leo) in it and also was a typical movie for a older audience, third age maybe, who like good dramas and think about feelings.Not a kind of movie for teenagers.
      Kristen had always made movies, until Twilight, with subject above of her age audience. She was being considered a serious actress who was making the transition for adult holes with quality. All the media and her peers considered that if she was in a project, it could be translated as this project probably was a good one.
      Suddenly after Twilight, some of these critics and bloggers lost their memory and started talking about her like she was a nobody that just appeared during Twilight and the forget that Twilight was initially a indie movie with a tradition indie director and with a tradition indie actress that became a phenomenon.
      I ended reading the books and I can say, Kristen did an amazing job with the character. Kristen’s Bella is perfect! She is exactly like that in the book. The only thing was… I never had have a opportunity of see a so terrible screenwriter job in my life. The dialogs are terrible and I can guarantee. The dialogs in the books are better than in the movies. All the actors had a lousy material to work with.
      As A.O. Scott told in of his reviews, Kristen did an extraordinary thing that maybe it was a motives of the huge success of the movies. She left space in her interpretation for all the women and girls enter and become her selves Bella. it made all the girls feel that they were living through her the romance. NO actress would be good enough for them beside them selves!

      So you people who are not twihards, have to give a try to this girl.

      If this movie will be a hit or not, it will be an assemble piece not just her! It is ridiculous put this pressure in her, with just 21 years. Beside she say that she only want to do good movies, with good stories, she is not interesting of becoming the next BO Star. I think she wants do her craft, learning in each opportunity to improve her possibilities, work with directors that she admires, like W. Salles, in On The Road.

      Lets give the girl a break!

      I am very exited for this new reading of Snow White. Disney was the reading that we all grew up but it seems good.

      It is not a spin off of any movie, it is just a medieval movie, and like one, will have war scenes and other scenes similarities to Lord of the Rings, Robin Hood, or Joan of the Arc. because they also were medieval movies. What do you want? A Snow White in a bike wearing leather clothes?

  • Tarek

    Dude, where’s my Pattinson ?

  • Pingback: Kristen Stewart On The Set Of ‘Snow White And The Huntsman’ (PICS) | – Sci-Fi Comic Books Movies and TV Online Video Blog Show()

  • Pingback: Albă ca Zăpada: Kristen la filmări | Blog Vedete()

  • Pingback: Movie Power Rankings: ‘Twilight’ tunes push ‘Breaking Dawn’ to No. 1 | Download Breaking Dawn()

  • Pingback: Rg Ladies Evil Queen Costume, Adult One Size Reviews()

  • Pingback: Kristen Stewart Shooting As Snow White: First Pics! | Informing Celebrity and Fashion()

  • Pingback: Kristen Stewart Shooting As Snow White: First Pics! | Grab The News()

  • Pingback: Kristen Stewart Shooting As Snow White: First Pics! | News Screen()

  • fremont home insurance

    It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you some fascinating issues or advice. Maybe you could write next articles relating to this article. I wish to learn more things approximately it!

  • Pingback: ‘Snow White & the Huntsman’ Set Photos: Kristen Stewart Goes Medieval [Updated]()