LAND OF THE LOST Review

by Matt Goldberg    Posted:June 4th, 2009 at 6:29 pm


head-2.jpgI don’t blame Universal for trying to sell “Land of the Lost” as a family film.  This is a big-budget summer movie based on a campy 70s TV show and so you’re going to highlight the T-Rex and maybe Will Ferrell dumping a vat of dinosaur urine over his head.  What you won’t highlight is a scene where Ferrell’s character whispers to Cha-Ka the ape-boy, “Fuck you.”  It’s clear that this movie was conceived of as a subversive, R-rated comedy and Universal said, “Are you bugfuck insane?  We’re not spending a hundred million dollars on that!” The compromise is a film that you’re not expecting even if you can totally predict its lead actor.

After a disastrous interview with Matt Lauer on “The Today Show”, Dr. Rick Marshall (Ferrell) is reduced to championing his theory of parallel universes available through his Tachyon Amplifier to kids on their class field trip to the La Brea Tar Pits.  But he has a fan in grad student Holly Cantrell (Anna Friel) and she believes in his research and spurs him to finish the devland_of_the_lost_01.jpgice.  The two go to a source of “tachyon energy” which rests on the shittiest amusement park on the face of the planet. To test the Amplifier, Marshall and Holly go down a tunnel of horrors ride with their guide Will Stanton (Danny McBride) and when Marshall activates the Amplifier, a portal opens up, and they’re thrown into the Land of the Lost.  Wacky adventures happen with grudging acknowledgments to the series, mainly in the form of the song, Cha-Ka, and the reptilian monsters known as “Sleestaks”.

“Land of the Lost” is mostly The Will Ferrell Show and it’s a repeat.  It’s the same character we’ve seen from him before: arrogant dumb guy yells a lot and delivers odd observations.  The question is whether or not that humor still works for you.  Ferrell’s completely comfortable in this comedic persona and I wonder how much of a shelf-life it has when folks can just stay at home and see the same kind of performance if they pop in “Step Brothers” or “Talladega Nights” or “Semi-Pro”.  And I don’t like harping on it because if I go back to my reviews of “Semi-Pro” or “Step Brothers”, I note the same criticism: Ferrell is funny but he’s not giving us anything we haven’t seen before.

This allows Danny McBride to step in and almost steal the show.  Even though he’s also playing an arrogant moron, there’s that tinge of redneck pride to the performance and while it is also similar to his work in “Eastbound and Down” and “The Foot Fist Way”, McBride is enough of a fresh face that we don’t feel like we’ve seen it all before.

But despite the familiarity, I was laughing.  I can’t remember at what, but I do remember laughing.  Ferrell and McBride are good at what they do but Anna Friel is absolutely wasted in her land_of_the_lost_movie_image_danny__will_and_anna.jpgrole and it’s kind of fucked up that she’s the only woman in the movie and doesn’t get to deliver a single joke.  Beyond the humor, the action is mostly forgettable and unimpressive.  The film appears ambivalent about whether it wants to embrace to low-budget camp of the original or use that big budget and instead it just looks like an expensive-but-still-kind-of-crappy version of the original.  I would have been more amused if they had really kept it all crappy looking and lo-rent.

Ferrell has stuck to what he knows best and what he knows best isn’t family comedy.  He knows swearing, yelling, and jokes that make people uncomfortable and if parents take their kids to this film, those kids aren’t going to get a lot of the jokes and those parents are going to hope that their kids don’t get a lot of the jokes (although there’s nothing in this movie that’s going to scar your child for life).  For those that don’t have to worry about the little ones, it’s an amusing movie and gives you exactly what you expect from Will Ferrell.  I would just prefer the unexpected from him.

Rating —– B minus







Please Like Collider on Facebook


11 Comments

User Comments (11 Responses)
  1. James @

    Maybe you were laughing because you were embarrased, Matt. Land of the Lost was an admittedly campy, corny piece of 70s nostalgia that tried to teach kids lessons about family, brotherhood and compassion. Everyone associated with this offensive, vulgar mess should be ashamed of what they've produced from the original.

  2. James @

    Maybe you were laughing because you were embarrased, Matt. Land of the Lost was an admittedly campy, corny piece of 70s nostalgia that tried to teach kids lessons about family, brotherhood and compassion. Everyone associated with this offensive, vulgar mess should be ashamed of what they've produced from the original.

  3. Jackie @

    Typical….inappropriate dialog and situations for kids. F minus

  4. Jackie @

    Typical….inappropriate dialog and situations for kids. F minus

  5. Jackie @

    Typical….inappropriate dialog and situations for kids. F minus

  6. mikw @

    I got a couple of laughs but not the best movies for kids and people that can’t take a joke.

  7. mikw @

    I got a couple of laughs but not the best movies for kids and people that can’t take a joke.

  8. mikw @

    I got a couple of laughs but not the best movies for kids and people that can’t take a joke.

  9. Izzie @

    Land of the Lost to me is a film that has many different depths. If this movie is taken as a comedy, you will be let down, if it is taken as an attempt to create nostalgia then the producers humiliated and the original a let down, if taken as a factual documentary then you really should consider asking a different person what they think the genre was. I guess you really have to be under the age of the rating 12 to go into expecting it to it to be funny and being satisfied (and not mind strong language), which is not a good thing in most respects, but – and I understand it will sound pathetic- if you start to watch the film with the right “attitude” then maybe the film will not be as bad as most of the reviews I have read portray it. I have seen the movie several times, and as sad as it may sound against the comments of the other reviewers, I found it quite amusing. I also watched the film a half year after it came out, so I had no high expectations as no one was talking about it any longer.

    This is a draft for a review I am writing for homework so if it sucks can you tell me?!?!?!?!

  10. blackheads @

    Thank you for every other magnificent post. Where else could anyone get that kind of info in such an ideal manner of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I’m at the search for such information.


Add Your Comments

    

Security Code:

Collider RSS Feeds Follow Steve on Twitter





Click Here