Lauren Shuler Donner has been producing X-Men movies since the first one back in 2000, so if you have questions about the franchise and where it's going, who better to ask? I had the opportunity to do so last year when Bryan Singer's X-Men: Days of Future Past was shooting in Montreal. 20th Century Fox invited a small group of reporters to visit the set to talk with the filmmakers and cast. During a break in filming, we landed an extended interview with Donner. She talked about her history with the franchise, how they decided where to go with the sequel, casting the actors, future X-Men movies, her thoughts on 3D, the tone of Days of Future Past, easter eggs, the Sentinels, her thoughts on how many superhero movies can be released per year, the Deadpool movie, and so much more. It's a great interview so hit the jump to check it out.
Question: Weâve been going back and forth with everyone today, trying to get them to tell us what the filmâs about without revealing too much.
LAUREN SCHULER DONNER: Ha, howâs that going? (laughter.)
Not well. The film is clearly influenced by a very famous common story, so a lot of info is out there. What can you tell people about the film?
DONNER: I can tell you⦠let me go back to its inception. This is meant to be a sequel to X-Men First Class, and in developing it we were thinking, OK, First Class took place in the â60s, so now what do we do? We just roll the cast into the â70s, and what happens in the â70s? Bryan had the idea that Magneto did something (cackles) and when you see the movie youâll know what I mean, Iâm sorry to be vague, anyway. Then the idea came up, letâs move them forward, but using Days of Future Past. And do me thatâs such a treat, because I just adore⦠when you do three movies with a bunch of actors then you party every weekend, you love each other! It was like just bringing together all my favorite people. Anyway. So thatâs how that happened. Â
Now, what is this about? Much like the [comic story] Days of Future Past there is Doctor Trask, who you know, and heâs created a Sentinel in the future that is wiping out all mutants. All mutant-kind. Weâre not strictly following the comic, weâre more adhering to the comic than, probably, before, but nonetheless. So, someone is sent back, and I think you know who is sent back to try to save the mutant race. And why is Logan sent back, rather than Kitty Pryde? Because itâs very dangerous to go back, and we thought the reality of it is that itâs very dangerous, and because heâs always healing himself we thought he would be the likely candidate. He does not have damage, but occasionally she canât really hold him. Occasionally when thereâs turbulence in the past it affects him in the future, because itâs the same guy, and sometimes heâll start to get out of it. The worry is, if he pops out of it, then all is lost. There are a couple times when it gets a little hairy.
Obviously we donât know how this movie ends, but at this point is there the sense that youâll have members of both these casts to play with going forward, or does this movie serve as a definitive end point to the story of that cast from the first three X-Men films?
DONNER: Well this is⦠no. Yes. No. (laughter) OK, next? (laughs) We will⦠continue⦠I canât tell you, really. We will continue with our main characters in the future versions. We want to diversify. We will bring in new characters. My mandate to myself since Iâve been involved in these movies was âmake every single movie different, so thereâs never X-Men fatigue.â What I loved about what Matthew Vaughn did was that he made it a Bond movie. A James Bond movie. I didnât want fans to say âIâve seen it, been there,â you know. And what James Mangold did with The Wolverine was he made it a noir. It had a whole different style, a whole different feel, more focus on character, it was kind of one of those old film noir movies. And Bryan, what heâs doing thatâs interesting is, itâs time to bring back the âclassic Coke,â the classic X-Men that we had before, the classic cast. Itâs the right way to do it. You wouldnât want to fool around and give it a different kind of style or genre, so thatâs perfect. Will we⦠we will bring a lot of people back, letâs just say that. And weâll bring in new characters, and we will release different kinds of X-Men stories. I donât know that weâre always going to follow this one, I think itâs time to reach out, to, well I canât say because youâll print it and then everyone will expect it.
Have you been involved in all the X-Men films?
DONNER: All of them. Every single one. This is my seventh. Well, I will say, I was ill last year, I had cancer last year, so I did not produce The Wolverine. I was there, involved, I always cast them, thatâs my big thing, and then in post, because by the time they finished shooting I was done with my treatment, but yes, in theory Iâve done all seven of them, this is my seventh. Iâm a huge fan, and I didnât grow up with it, I didnât grow up reading X-Men comics. I became a huge fan, I had somebody in my company who gave me the biographies of all the characters. I read Loganâs first, and was like what a great, tragic character. I just loved him. I read Jean Greyâs next, and again, not such a tragic character, but a complex one, and I just kept reading. I said, âthis is it.â Iâm a huge fan, and I find that the Marvel characters, unlike the DC characters, or any other comic characters, are flawed and dark and complex. There is much more to identify with, and to make them real. Bryan and I agreed from the very beginning, letâs ground them and make them as realistic as possible so that when she creates weather or he bamfs from here to there, people will buy it. And to me, they are real. In a sense.
You have so many characters that are critical to the story, with actors who may or may not have wanted to come back. As youâre in preproduction, what happens if Patrick Stewart canât come back? Or if Ian McKellen doesnât want to come back?
DONNER: Oh, well, we were screwed then. (laughs) But as we thought about doing this story we did reach out to those two, just to see if they would come back. They did want to, thankfully. The production nightmare for us was that they have these plays, alternating plays that they are doing in NYC, and they had a set rehearsal time. We had to tailor our filming to get them when we could. We had four weeks with them. So we started off filming the future, because thatâs when we had them, and then we had to let them go because they had guaranteed rehearsal time. With Hugh, too. We reached out to a lot of the cast. First of all, the old cast, because we wanted to make sure they would come back. And then, once we knew vaguely what the idea was, we didnât know enough to say OK, this character and that will be inâ¦. with Hugh, yes, we checked with him. We checked with him late, but we did check with him.
Youâre shooting native 3D; was there talk about doing post-conversion for 3D?
DONNER: Yes. I personally disagree with Bryan, but Bryan, I respect his opinion more because heâs the director. I believe in the future it will all be post-converted. The post-conversion is getting better and better and better. Bryan had just finished Jack the Giant Slayer and hung out with James Cameron and Peter Jackson, and theyâre such 3D fanatics that it was in his head, he decided he had to shoot native 3D. I advocate⦠from now on I would only do the conversion, because itâs gotten so good. And I believe that most of the audience canât tell the difference.
Iâll be frank about this, I think some 3D movies are terrible, even if theyâre shot in 3D, because they donât take advantage of the format, and they donât frame anything⦠examples of great 3D: Hugo, Life of Pi.
DONNER: Had to be 3D.
Yes. Is there anything in this where youâre taking advantage of the format, or using it to say âthis is why you need to see it in 3D.â
DONNER: (thoughtful pause) â¦Quicksilver? For one. And I agree â Life of Pi, yes, obviously. But not really, if you look at it, if you read the book it was a journey⦠yes, itâs a fable, but itâs supposed to be a realistic journey, youâre supposed to buy it as realistic. Hugo, yes, of course. Yes, there are certain scenes that we designed and shoot with 3D in mind, yes.
You know what Iâm saying, though, about a certain framing. Some 3D movies are just spectacular.
DONNER: Weâre looking at this differently. When I say âweâ I mean Bryan. In his last movie I know he only watched the 3D monitor and focused on that. This time his feeling was, for the most part â heâll go check all the time, because obviously he wants to make sure that we are taking advantage of it â but heâs also now focusing more on the characters. And you can only do that in 2D. You can either watch the frame and how itâs going, or as a director you can look at your actors, which is what itâs all about, and try to make it real. So his monitor at his station is 2D, heâll go up and meet with the actors, and then heâll run over and check the 3D, so itâs not the first priority. BUT, heâs got people who are doing that for him. We have the 3D team that is doing that for him, and if they feel that itâs not being framed right, if they feel like weâre not taking advantage of a situation they will let him know.
What about the tone? First Class was light, this seems like a much darker story. How are they meshing?
DONNER: It meshes because of the storylines. The look, no, it doesnât. Which is fine. You saw that, you saw the look and the tone in First Class. [This is] darker by necessity, you have the chance that the mutant race is going to be wiped out. The difference in look between the mutant future and the past is very different. Itâs very dark in the future, very dark. Really dark. Although beautiful, in a sort of happy/sad, schadenfreude way. Really gorgeous. But theyâre dealing with their death. And the past has a darker tone because thereâs so much conflict between the characters, between Charles and Erik, who must work together in order to save the future, and they are in a place where they are not together emotionally, because of this dire situation. The clock is ticking and they have to get there. So itâs very serious, it feels that the subject matter is more serious than First Class.
Can you talk about Peter Dinklage?
DONNER: Heâs a wonderful guy! Well, heâs Bolivar Trask, heâs Doctor Trask. So thatâs how he fits into the story. it is his desire to create the Sentinels. And, in terms of casting, Fox and Roger M, whoâs our casting director, and Donna Isaacsen, who is the casting director from Fox, and myself put together this enormous list of who he could be. And Bryan looked at that list and said Peter Dinklage. And we all discussed â
Was Dinklage on that list?
DONNER: He was on that list, I donât know who put him on, I think it was Donna. There was a variance of people and ages, and we knew he was the appropriate age. They went up a little bit higher in age, a little bit lower, there were names and ânot-names,â up and coming names, a humorous way, a serious way, much more serious, but he was literally our first choice. There were other people we all liked, there were some really good ideas, there are some wonderful actors out there, but once⦠the minute Bryan told me that it was like Oh my god. Because of the irony of it all, because heâs such a great actor, because we love him, because he already reaches a certain fan base that we like to reach, for a zillion reasons. But first and foremost because he was right for the movie. No, oddly enough, we didnât have a second choice. Iâm sure there were ten second choices, there were people we all liked and talked about. But he so led the pack that we honed in on him. Then we had to work with HBO, try to work out the schedules, all that horrible stuff.
At Comic-Con he drew a huge audience â heâs incredibly popular right now. And itâs good casting, but it was universally praised. Whatâs that like for you, to see that reaction?
DONNER: To me, itâs really exciting because there are a couple of small, fanboy websites who got my email and will occasionally email me, and I got one that was saying âwhy Peter Dinklage? Heâsâ¦. why?â And so I thought, âOh, dear, people arenât seeing it.â But you make a choice and you live with it, you live BY it. So when the fans really responded to him, it made us feel like âOK, at least there are some people who like the idea of it.â Itâs great. itâs good because you work so hard on a movie and you want people to come for whatever reason theyâre coming â get âem in the theaters, because then you feel the movie will win them over. And if theyâre coming for Peter Dinklage, good on them.
This business is different now, in part because of the success of X-Men. Now Marvel is planning four years in the future â how do you feel about the changes and the expectations?
DONNER: We will do something similar. We have been talking, âweâ meaning Fox and some of the people involved in the film, in terms of also laying out a timeline, which characters can be spun off, which stories we can do, if we pick one story, which stories THAT will lead to, that sort of thing. I think itâs a very good idea. I think Kevin Feigeâs very smart â I gave Kevin his first job. I think he has done it right, heâs done it how we always ask to have it done, and heâs done a terrific job. And I think itâs good to tell the fans âthis movieâs going to lead to that, and that will lead toâ¦â It gives fans a confidence. And we will start to do that also.
You have a relationship with Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige; whatâs it going to take to combine certain characters?
DONNER: (Sigh.)
There has to be bad blood between Marvel and Fox, because Fox has all these characters that Marvel wants â would it be hard to work together, or at some point in the future if this slows down and the timing is right, of course youâre going to have that conversation? Or are we reading too much into this?
Producer Lauren Shuler Donner Interview
continued on Page 2
DONNER: That goes on at a corporate level, thatâs not what Iâm about. I produce the movies, I try to push other ones in the future, but what goes on between Marvel and Fox â Iâm not invited to that party. I canât answer that question.
Youâre working on X-Force, weâre talking about how there should be a New Mutants movie. Fox has all these mutant characters; when do you think we will see more movies announced?
DONNER: I think we have to figure out how many X-Men films a summer can handle without getting into X-Men fatigue. And I just mentioned New Mutants off the top of my head because thatâs a personal passion of mine. Iâm not saying thatâs Foxâs next movie, please donât misquote me or Iâll get a call. But we have to be very careful. As you all know thereâs a Deadpool script that is out there, and you know about X-Force and you know about Fantastic Four. Thereâs a summer, thereâs a year, say 2014, 2015, how many can you put out? Take into consideration there are also Marvel movies coming out then. At a certain point people want to see other movies besides comic book movies so you have to be really careful what youâre going to pick, and how many are going to be released within a year.
People say the Deadpool script is awesome, and clearly should be rated R. An X-Men movie has to be PG-13, but what about doing Deadpool at a lower budget point, releasing it at a different time than the middle of May? Is that an option, because Marvel is clearly not walking the R-rated path.
DONNER: Right. I agree.
I was hoping for more than âI agree.â
DONNER: First of all, the Deadpool movie should be $50m in any event, whether it is PG-13 or R. Because itâs a single character, it doesnât involve that many of the other mutants, which means not many other powers, which is CGI, which is what costs so much. It would be a lot of action, but it should be â and because itâs a standalone character, just like the Wolverine films, we keep them at a smaller budget, so it should be a $50m budget regardless. And I am a producer who NEVER discusses her budgets, EVER, ever ever. But that one should be kept small. As for the rest of it, I canât really talk about it. Iâd love to take the movie, itâs a really good script, weâll see.
We all want that.
DONNER: Good! Iâm glad! Write Fox and tell them. Thank you.Â
Themes â is the interpretation here intended to be open, or are there specific intents to push a metaphor in one direction?
DONNER: Well, this is difficult because there are so many story lines and thereâs always the undercurrent of tolerance, and because of that all of us who feel like weâre outsiders and misfits, for whatever reason, can blend right in. Some of us are more obvious with our flaws as mutants are with their visible characteristics, and some are not. The other themes, of friendship, uniting, we try to push our themes, and we try to make our movie mean something besides a good time with a lot of action and a lot of CGI and actors that you like. We really do. Thatâs one of the reasons I like working with Bryan, because thatâs always first and foremost in his mind. So we try very much to push the themes, yes.
Is that the same reason you think women who might not be big fans of comics or X-Men should watch these films?
DONNER: Oh absolutely. And there are very strong female characters, thatâs another reason I was drawn to it, there are Storm and Rogue and Jean Grey, thereâs a lot to identify with, yes.
You get one f-bomb in this movie. Do you know where it will be, because weâve heard there are a few actors who have casually mixed it in.
DONNER: Well, they do it to get the feeling, theyâre angry, itâs effing this and effing that, and it will come out. And weâll look and weâll choose. I think I know where it will be, yes.
Do you think it will be Hugh again?
DONNER: I do not. But that was the best use of it, yeah, I think.
Hugh seems like he continues to be very comfortable with this character
DONNER: Not only comfortable. We did discuss, after the last movie, the thing I liked about The Wolverine was how internal he was, how he pulled it in, and kept it down, and therefore pulled you in. So, yes. heâs very comfortable with his character, heâs very comfortable with evolving this character through time, even though he bounces back and forth through time, I think itâs really fascinating from the day he started to where he is today. itâs really amazing.
What do you do when he decides heâs done?
DONNER: I cry! Because I love him, I want to work with him! I donât know! Iâm hoping that day wonât come, we keep talking about other stories to spin, and of course he wants to do other movies and theater and he wants to take time to be a dad. So far, I think itâs not on the horizon, but Iâm sure it will be one day. Itâs hard to push your body like that. Thank god the character doesnât age! (laughs) Phsyically, he has given a lot. I loved it when the poster came out for The Wolverine, and there was a lot of chatter on the internet that it was photoshopped, itâs NOT. Thatâs that man, ok! Have him pull his shirt off, heâll show you. Thatâs another reason for women to come!
Curious about easter eggs in the film, thereâs a lot in the comics that can be thrown in. Is that something you think about, and are there things fans can look forward to?
DONNER: There is, but Iâm going to save it because I want to make a game out of it. And maybe weâll reveal it through some of the fan sites. I canât tell you what it is, but thereâs something really great thatâll be super-fun to look for on the Blu-ray. Thatâs one. And in terms of the other stuff, if I tell you it wonât be a fun surprise!
Iâm not looking for specifics, just a âyes, in certain sequences.â
DONNER: Yes⦠more, not easter eggs, but a tip of the hat. We always like to tip out hat, and have, like Remy LeBeau being mentioned in X2, like we know about Gambit, and so on a list in X2 thereâs Remy LeBeau. Or in the bar we had Hank McCoy in the background, because we could never figure out how to build Beast, and do it classy. We could never figure it out, so that was our way of saying âwe know he should be in the scene, so here he is.â (laughs) That sort of thing is what weâll do.
Having worked on all the films, what has changed for you over the years?
DONNER: I could tell you so much. One of them is Hugh. Heâs such a nice guy, it took him a while to get inside and find the angry side. And now heâs very comfortable, very free to tap into that anger. The other is interesting, and⦠the first movie⦠Bryan and I tend to see eye to eye very much, we always do. The one thing we argued about was tone. He very much wanted to make a really dark movie, and I felt an obligation to bring in fun. Thatâs Joss Whedonâs script when he says âhow do I know?â and the answer is âyouâre a dick,â thatâs Joss. We had to push for that. Bryanâs tendency was to make that very, very dark, and I was afraid weâd never get to the second one if it was unrelentingly dark. We argued about tone, and he finally allowed me a few light moments. Now I look at it and I think, âOK, we can go dark, letâs go dark.â Weâve established the characters. And Logan, traditionally, has that dark humor, you know, and to not allow him that is to not fully develop the character. Heâs got to toss off those one-liners now and then. But now I see that weâve come this way and we can go darker and darker and darker, so that I find very interesting.
Has the audience changed as well?
DONNER: I think the time has changed. I see all these apocalyptic movies, which 13 years ago when we first made this wasnât really in our zeitgeist. It is now, because of 9/11, because of the economy, it is more and more now. There is a darker awareness, although it would seem to reason that because life is so much tougher now people would seek entertainment to just totally escape. But it seems that there is a certain desire to look at it and make it come out alright, World War Z style. So thatâs how the audience has changed.
Can you take bigger chances now?
DONNER: What Iâm always afraid of is going âoff-book,â so to speak, you know, I always get upset when the director leaves the classic comic that was so very popular. I argued, and I wonât say with who about what, but when we go way away from the original source material⦠that material is popular for a reason and I like to stick with it. The audience has been very generous with us, because we have taken big dramatic liberties, but I think you can do it with individual characters, and we have to be careful with our stories.Â
Can you talk about the Sentinels here?
DONNER: Theyâre nasty! I canât too much, they evolve into very threatening enemies, destroyers. Thatâs all I can say. Theyâre cool-looking, theyâre almost omnipotent; theyâre super-cool, I have to be vague. Sorry.
Bryan has been tweeting a lot of pictures of the production â is that something you talked about and worked out? And does he still have time to direct in between tweeting?
DONNER: (laughs) How long does it take to tweet? Yes, we discussed it, this was all pre-planned. It was more fun this way, it was more fun from his point of view. We could get a photo the traditional way and release it, but this seemed more fun. We all decided we wouldnât show anything head-on, so in the beginning we were finding our way. Theyâre teases, thatâs our approach to it. Nicely-framed teases. Itâs not the pat, unit photographerâs photo of the thing. Itâs âhey, hereâs the movie Bryan is directing, and this is directly from Bryanâs iPhone.â And thereâs one scene with jets, and theyâre really cool, it was a day I wasnât here, so Bryan tweets me a movie of him standing as these jets appear to come out from his head â I wanted to tweet that, but he wouldnât let me.
Are you comfortable with the culture of expectation that has grown up around these films, that fans want two years worth of info before the movie comes out?
DONNER: Oh, yes! Listen, when I originally sold X-Men it was because I knew there was 40 years of stories. That was the point! Not only to do the movie and establish the characters, you know, you love the one youâre doing. It was because there are all these great stories, what a wealth of drama.
And youâre already talking about the next movie?
DONNER: Yeah! And not only that, but which one over here, and which one over here, yeah.
For more from my X-Men: Days of Future Past set visit:
- 90 Things to Know about Bryan Singerâs X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST from Our Set Visit
- 5 New Images From X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Feature Jennifer Lawrence, Peter Dinklage, Michael Fassbender, Hugh Jackman and More
- Hugh Jackman Talks Reuniting with Bryan Singer, Battling Sentinels, How Long Heâll Play Wolverine, and More on the Set of X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST
- James McAvoy Talks Hanging Out with the Cast, His Scene with Patrick Stewart, Professor Xâs Hair, and More on the Set of X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST
- Director Bryan Singer Talks Bringing Back the Original Cast, Sentinels, Shooting in 3D, Time Travel Mechanics, and More on the Set of X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST
- Writer/Producer Simon Kinberg Talks the Evolution of the Script, Time Travel, the X-MEN Franchise, and More on the Set of X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST