RUSH Review

by     Posted 347 days ago


For the past decade, I’ve approached Ron Howard‘s films with a mix of trepidation and outright dread.  Apollo 13 is an amazing piece of filmmaking, but from there, he’s seemed content to play it safe to the point of inertia.  A Beautiful Mind may be daring in its direction, but its story is worthy of a TV movie.  Considering the horrors of the Robert Langdon movies, the unwatchable Oscar-bait Cinderella Man, and the low-ball The Dilemma, my skepticism towards his latest picture, Rush, was more than warranted.  Thankfully, Howard seems to be alive again as he goes full throttle on taking the viewer inside the world of Formula 1 racing.  More importantly, he has a worthwhile story at the center.  While Howard still feels the need to spoon-feed the themes, the strong performances and intensity of the racing scenes make his latest picture a ride worth taking.

The story centers on the rivalry between Formula 1 racers Niki Lauda (Daniel Brühl) and James Hunt (Chris Hemsworth).  Both men come from privileged backgrounds, and these cushy comforts cause them to rebel and test their mettle in the dangerous world of F1 racing.  Their beginnings also coincide as they both push to make the leap from Formula 3 racing up to F1 through their financial power rather than competing through the ranks.  But once at the F1 level, their rivalry intensifies due in part to their drastically different personalities—the pragmatic, calculating Lauda could not be further from the adrenaline-fueled, arrogant playboy Hunt.  However, as their rivalry heats up, it begins to bring out their best and worst qualities.


Since Lauda and Hunt don’t start competing in earnest until they’re in F1, the movie is a bit slow to start because it’s not all that interesting to see guys use financial maneuvers instead of showing their skill behind the wheel.  Thankfully, the pacing allows Brühl and Hemsworth to bring some texture to their characters if not shading.  The film is about a clash of clearly defined personalities, and the uptight, austere Lauda makes a good foil for the freewheeling Hunt.  Personally, I found Lauda a bit more compelling since he has a direct passion for racing while Hunt is looking for thrills, and F1 just happens to be a way he can get them.  “It’s a coffin on top of a bomb,” Hunt tells his future wife, Suzy Miller (Olivia Wilde)  He still cares about the art of racing (there’s a great scene where he’s “practicing” by visualizing each turn and moving his feet and arms in response), but the sharp, exacting Lauda is a bit funnier in his inability to have fun.

Once the racing begins, Howard demonstrates the technical attention to detail that helped make Apollo 13 so wonderful.  It’s difficult to find new ways to shoot racing, but cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle gets some amazing shots, and editors Daniel P. Hanley and Mike Hill edit them together to create an exhilarating experience on the track.  Furthermore, Howard slowly ramps up the intensity of each race, so we’re on the edge of our seats by the time Lauda and Hunt are swerving around on a rain-drenched track.  The director has made us buy into their rivalry and the sport to where we don’t think it’s silly for them to risk their lives over a trophy.  It makes perfect sense.


It’s crucial that we care about the men behind the wheel, and all of the characters besides Lauda and Hunt end up being window dressing.  Wilde is absolutely wasted in her brief role, and while that character does illustrate Hunt’s personality, it’s strange to cast a recognizable face for such a minor part.  The expert piece of casting is Brühl.  He’s still a stranger to most audiences even though he had a supporting role in Inglourious Basterds.  In a leading part, Brühl’s is a scene stealer.  Hemsworth is good, but Hunt is almost a variation on Thor.  It’s a swaggering, entitled guy who’s out to win glory but learns to grow up.  Meanwhile, Brühl successfully navigates his way through a character who’s always serious, but sometimes that seriousness can get some big deadpan laughs.

The two actors are at their best when sharing the screen.  Together, their characters’ rivalry truly comes alive rather than just bitching behind each other’s back.  But Howard falters by not trusting his audience to glean the importance of their rivalry and rivalries in general.  Rush is not a complex film, and the message is readily apparent, but Howard still feels the need to have his characters spell it out.  It reduces the character-driven narrative to a showcase of fast cars and a lesson.


Even when Rush reaches this low, it’s easily Howard’s best film in years.  There’s a fire to the picture that’s been absent from his work for far too long.  Howard’s passion for the story comes alive through the devotion of his lead actors and the intensity of the racing scenes.  There’s no need to spell out why having a rival is different than having an enemy.  The definition becomes more than clear in the conflict between Lauda and Hunt.  Thankfully, Rush never gets too hung up on imparting lessons to its audience.  The primary focus is putting two intriguing figures inside a couple of coffin-bombs, and letting us feel the heat and respect the speed.

Rating: B-


Like Us


FB Comments

  • Burning_Horizon

    I stopped reading after he said that “Cinderella Man” was unwatchable …

  • Burning_Horizon

    I stopped reading after he said that “Cinderella Man” was unwatchable …

    • João Paulo

      Me too.

    • axalon

      Well it is Mr. Goldberg

    • TheMattedScreen

      I love the part in Cinderella Man where electricity cures the kid’s cold

      • Liderc

        He was staying with his mother’s family for a week, I imagine that’s what cured his cold, you know, staying warm and eating actual food.

      • TheMattedScreen

        Is that how it worked? Watched it recently and all I saw was no electricity – kid gets sick, mom sends kids away, Russel begs for some $ and power gets turned back on – kid is cured, I try not to knock the movie, I really want to like it, but it is pretty damn cheesy

    • Bilbo

      He pissed me off at this point. Why be insultive unless he just doesn’t have anything intelligent to say anyway. His opinion means squat to me now.

    • dungeons and draccus’s

      I know, right? You’re an idiot if you think Cinderella Man is unwatchable. And A Beautiful Mind is awesome.

  • Pingback: RUSH (2013) Review | The Reel Scoop

  • João Paulo

    I think Matt forget about the thrilling and powerful Frost/Nixon, Howard is a great director and I don’t agree “Cinderella Man” is a great movie and I can’t wait to watch Rush.

  • Liderc

    “the unwatchable Oscar-baitCinderella Man” ? You have to be kidding. One of the best boxing films of all time.

  • Stefan Bonomo

    I can understand if you don’t like it, that’s perfectly fine, but “Cinderella Man” unwatchable? Really? I thought The Dilemma was unwatchable.
    ……..and still waiting for Dark Tower………..

    • dungeons and draccus’s

      Aye, the Dark Tower. And these are the ONLY guys who can star as Deschain: Russell Crowe, Javier Bardem, Jim Caviezel, Guy Pearce, Viggo Mortensen, Richard Armitage, and possibly Timothy Olyphant. Agree?

      • PANTS

        Armitage wouldn’t be bad, but Crowe and Mortensen are getting too old, Bardem has that distracting accent, Caviezel is tied up for at least another few years with Person of Interest, Olyphant doesn’t have the gravitas, and Guy Pearce…well I just don’t think he’s right for Roland. I personally think Hugh Jackman, Christian Bale, or Michael Fassbender would be pretty great, or if you want to go with a pick that sacrifices star power to suit the role a bit better, I would consider Liev Schreiber to be a good fit. Of course, they could just cast Benedict Cumberbatch because he’s great in everything.

      • dungeons and draccus’s

        Armitage would be great – he’s got the gravitas and cool factor, and I always pictured Deschain as an older guy. Mortensen 6 years ago would have been perfect, and Crowe, well, if he can take off a few of those pounds, he’s be the spitting image of Deschain, AND he’s worked with Ron Howard before.

        Bardem would be great, too, and he’s the guy I imagined Roland looking like when I read the book. Caviezel can take roles on the side – he is a phenomenal, electrifyingly brilliant actor. Guy Pearce, yeah, he’s a long shot.

        But WHAT went through your mind when you suggest Christian Bale or Michael Fassbender? Brilliant actors both, but I’m sick of people mentioning Fassbender and Cumberbatch EVERY SINGLE DAMN TIME. SOMEBODY. CASTS. A MOVIE. Sheesh.

      • Stefan Bonomo

        Armtiage would be great for Roland. Bardem could work, he has the look for Roland, and same with Mortensen. Crowe I think is too old and too big, and like he said, Caveizel would be great, but he has Person of Interest.

      • Stefan Bonomo

        Armtiage would be great for Roland. Bardem could work, he has the look for Roland, and same with Mortensen. Crowe I think is too old and too big, and like he said, Caveizel would be great, but he has Person of Interest.

  • eternalozzie

    this movie sounds like a “guy flick” … 2 men having a measuring contest but on a racetrack … Matt always sounds so bitter and jaded in his reviews :) … you got to respect his honesty … there is no guessing where he stands on something.

  • Rjd123

    You say give it a strong positive review but give it a B-? Also, A Beautiful Mind was a great movie.

  • Chodeberg

    Goldberg being fucking Goldberg. Another classic review.

  • Iv

    Where the fuck do you leave Frost/Nixon? That movie is fucking badass.

  • Pingback: TOP 5: RUSH Interviews, Fact-Checking the Science of BREAKING BAD, Fox Bringing Commissioner Gordon Series GOTHAM to TV, DON JON Interviews, Cinemath | Collider

  • Pingback: Ron Howard to Direct MENA Based on the True Story of Gun-Runner and Drug Trafficker Barry Seal | Collider

Click Here