THE TOURIST Review

by     Posted: December 10th, 2010 at 7:29 am

the_tourist_movie_image_angelina_jolie_johnny_depp_slice_01

Twist endings are a tricky proposition.  When executed successfully, they give the film a bravura finish that will have people talking for years to come.  But that’s rare.  More often than not, they leave the audience confused and frustrated.  The Tourist is a charming albeit forgettable trifle of a film that chooses to throw an unnecessary and maddeningly stupid twist at the audience.  It’s a twist ending that not only blows up in the movie’s face, but blows it’s face clean off, turning a pretty veneer into a mangled pile of “Are you kidding me?’ and “That makes no goddamned sense.”

The film begins with the financial crimes unit of Scotland Yard trailing Elise Ward (Angelina Jolie), the most beautiful, confident, and well-attired woman in the world.  Possessing the beauty of a goddess and a look that screams “I will never have sex with you,” Elise is trying to throw the cops off her trail so that they’ll stop chasing her husband, Alexander Pierce, a mob banker who stole billions from his boss.  The British government is in on the chase because 744 million of that amount belonged to them (why the mobster has that money is never explained).  Despite their surveillance, Pierce is still easily able to communicate with Elise through letters and he informs her that she needs to find a stranger with his height and build so that the cops (who don’t know what Pierce looks like) will trail the poor stranger.  It’s an elaborate set-up for what seems like a minor diversion.

the_tourist_movie_image_angelina_jolie_johnny_depp_02

On a train from Paris to Venice, Elise chooses her stooge by sitting across from Frank (Johnny Depp), Wisconsin’s handsomest yet charmingly-befuddled community college math teacher.  Frank is, naturally, beguiled by the mysterious Elise but it turns out that the cops aren’t the only one after Pierce.  The mobster (Steven Berkoff) and his goons are also chasing down Pierce and because of a case of mistaken identity, they’re now after poor Frank.  It’s a charming premise that begins to lose steam as director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck seems more interested in capturing the beauty of Venice rather than developing the characters or devising exciting chase scenes.

But up until the twist, The Tourist is a satisfactory diversion.  While the visuals make The Tourist ultimately feel more like a tourism video for Venice (provided you’re ridiculously wealthy) than an attempt to better tell the story, Depp and Jolie acquit themselves well at their roles.  Jolie’s confidence is staggering and you can see the joy Elise takes in grabbing an entire room’s attention with nothing more than a grin.  It’s also nice to see Depp playing an everyman rather than the bizarre outsider he usually portrays.  Frank is a charming character and he gets solid laughs every time he speaks Spanish as if it were Italian.

the_tourist_movie_image_angelina_jolie_johnny_depp_01

And then the film makes its twist and ruins just about everything that came before.  I’m going to have spoil what happens in order to explain why it’s so bad, so if you’re still interested in seeing the movie, please stop reading now.

Okay, so here’s the twist: Pierce is actually Frank.  Midway through the film, we learn that Elise is actually working for the financial crimes unit but has been suspended.  She was working undercover in order to reveal the financial misdeeds being conducted by Pierce on the behalf of the mob, but instead she ended up falling for him.  At the end of the film, Frank reveals to Elise that he’s actually Pierce.  And since he’s got the money, the two get away with it.

The twist makes no sense.  Even if we assume that Elise doesn’t know Frank is Pierce until the end of the movie (and it’s possible she could have known from the beginning when you consider how poorly the twist is implemented and explained), his actions make no sense.  In order to avoid the cops, he puts himself and Elise in the crosshairs of the mob.  Furthermore, their behavior towards each other is inexplicable.  “Frank” is trying to woo Elise so Pierce is actually testing his wife’s love even though she cares for him enough to follow any instructions he sends her and doesn’t seem to care about her career or that he’s a thief.  The twist turns Frank from a lovable everyman caught in larger-than-life circumstances to a manipulative schemer who was playing everyone from the start.

Perhaps we could derive a modicum of pleasure from Frank’s deceit if we saw how he was pulling the strings the whole time.   Most movies with a twist ending like to show you how clever they are and will cut back to all the clues showing that you should have figured it out from the start, you gigantic dummy.  The Tourist doesn’t even bother.  Instead, Elise makes a quip about Pierce’s new face, and they set sail with all the money they stole.  No flashbacks or even a cursory argument of how Pierce chose to deceive her and make her his puppet.  In the end, Frank’s a liar, Elise is corrupt, they get rich off stolen cash, the cops decide to drop the case, and they all lived happily ever after.  That’s not a bad ending for a biting satire on post financial-crisis America, but it’s a miserable way to close out what’s mostly a light-hearted romantic thriller.

Rating: D




Please Like Collider on Facebook

Comments:
  • Bill Graham

    As soon as you said that the twist was ridiculous and then went into detail about no one having seen Pierce, I immediately understood where the twist would go. Yikes.

    • saagkhan

      you’re Right… it was obvious after that… I bet Jolie and Depp also getaway with Millions and Millions from The Tourist.
      They rarely do any movie and then appear together in such a loose movie makes it Obvious.

  • guy

    mentioning there is a big twist makes it obvious what the twist might be if you’ve seen the trailer. that is called a ‘spoiler’. this review is poison.

  • Jackalope

    You’re kidding me? I thought that was what would happen when I saw the trailer, but assumed that it was so stupid, only I could have thought of it and dismissed it as a possiblity!

  • Rob

    Hi, I went to see the film last night and up until the last like 2 minutes of the film, I was following it fine. The last part confused the hell out of me, I wasn’t sure who was Frank, who was that guy they cut to outside at the end?! I’ve read your review and it kind of makes sense, but like you say…some of the things that ‘Frank’ did, he’d never do if he was actually Alexander, surely :\ This film left me baffled, frustrated and confused!!!

  • Sara

    Have you never seen the French movie Anthony Zimmer? The Tourist is a remake. So that in itself is a big spoiler alert! I have not seen The Tourist yet, just the trailer, however I am pretty sure the French movie is much better inspite Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie.

  • Jenna

    Hey, I saw the movie approximately two hours ago, and I have a few things to throw in into this movie.
    (Note: some spoilers here)
    First off, how could you NOT suspect that ‘Frank’ was actually Pearce? I had the suspicion the moment I saw the REAL tourist appeared in the ballroom. There were a MILLION hints as to Frank’s real identity, though I admit that they were indeed small and slightly insignificant if you weren’t poised for it the entire time. Also, near the end, when Frank is chained inside of the British tracking boat or whatever, you can clearly tell that he knows Pearce won’t come to save Elise. (Even BIGGER hint, there) It’s called watching their verbal language. Maybe it’s just me, but what is the fun in handing out huge hints during a movie so that by the time the ‘twist’ comes, it’s so obvious that all you want to do is yell ‘Duh!’? There’s no fun in that whatsoever! I thought it was an excellent twist. But then again, that’s just my opinion.

    • Jenna

      Sorry, I meant nonverbal.. lol

  • Robyn Patsos

    Saw the Tourist today and thoroughly enjoyed it. Nothing too heavy, nothing to stupid, nothing to sleazy, nothing to full of profanities, nothing full of nudity and sex. Nice, very pleasing to the eye, and a good story line. I worked it out 3/4 of the way through, but was still a nice, good, enjoyable film. Kept me watching, most films don’t. Good film, not a great film, but very good and enjoyment. I would recommend to friends.

  • Khalid

    The application of the characters are not in line as far as concern of the mind blowing concept. Frank Body language is skip from the start of this movie.. That is the reason that is makes frustration for audience.

  • jirawan amornvej

    There should have been some soft love scenes of Jolie and Depp
    which could help the movie less boring and sleepy.

  • Pingback: gmanReviews » Blog Archive » General Consensus: Gulliver’s Travels, The Tourist, Tangled

  • Chris

    I started to watch the movie and as soon as Elise got the message to board the train and find someone of similar height and build and “make him believe” he is Alexander I knew that it would be him. But the movie was so slow I lost patience with it after half an hour ( I was watching it on my computer in China). So I went to the reviews to see if there was any point to it and was not surprised to read how it ends. The half hour I watched I thought was extremely lame.

  • Chris

    Also it beggers belief that a man who was already under surveillance ( Elise was under cover tracking him) and must have been a high profile person to be in the position he was in would not have had his photo on file. That for me was the clincher which made the rest of the movie not worth watching.

  • trethel dax

    Mr. Matt?? thank you for this review,,.. it helped me a lot to organize my reaction paper… I owe you one.. take care always..=)

  • gio

    but….what if frank really isnt pierce and hes just passing off as him. because when elise and frank go to the hotel and check in, a man stares at elise as they pass by. this is the same guy that at the end is said to be pierce(not frank) and is caught by the police but he says he is just a “tourist” and that a man(being frank) kept texting him. so this “tourist” could have been the real pierce and texted frank the safe code and only let elise leave with frank because he loved her and wanted her to be happy because he knew that she fell in love with frank and he felt bad that he had led a life of crime

  • Kasi

    It made perfect sense. I knew who he was the whole time and so did Elise. She wasn’t a puppet. They faked the letter thing and how she was supposed to hook some sucker that looked like him to throw the cops off. I don’t think they meant for the mob boss to come after them. They were also having kind of a fight the whole time in a roundabout way because she didn’t like the way he ‘summoned’ her and he was trying to prove he was different. They wanted to be together but had to play it cool while the cops watched.

  • nancy

    I was so confused at the end of the movie that I try watching it again. Depp’s behaviour as Alexander makes no sense cause he looked originally confused by what was happening to him. And if Elise knew that Frank was actualy Alexander, why did they not… I don’t know…sleep together in the hotel?And what was up with the dialog they had after she saved him and picked the lock of his handcuffs? And it was stupid that she was an undercover agent for a whole year and the police didn’t have a photo of him!I was so disappointed…

  • Rafael

    this movie was a piece of shit. my barras tonight could have made a better movie. screw this i am so confused and upset.

  • Angry Baras

    this movie just sharted all over my hopes and dreams…. the baras tryna escape from my A-hole could have been a bigger success.

  • hungry4baras

    the tourist alternative ending: Ange and johnny sit down for a big munch on some fresh Baras.

  • Barafan468

    Hey tourist – Johnny wants his reputation back

  • Ad

    Subtle hints were thrown out there as to the real identity of Frank. Whether Elise and Alexander concocted this plan together from the start, or it was all Alexander’s doing is left to the viewer to decide imo. The twist made sense to me either way. If together – they made sure to act as strangers to keep a low profile, even those conversations…which sounded like flirtatious banter. They needed to be careful as they were being tracked, listened to, watched, every step of the way. The agent with the original suspicion that Frank might be Alexander was the biggest clue to me.

  • tanvir

    this is a ok but a sexy movie and i have a sexy cat

  • Juan

    I think you didn’t understand the movie. Frank isn’t Pierce. Frank was always insecure on tough situations, even when he was alone. Don’t you remember?? What happened was: at the end, Frank helped Alexander Pierce escape in exchange for his woman (Jolie). When Jolie said the line at the end about the face, she was just joking. This is the beauty of the movie: the love Frank had for her.

Features

IndieClick Film Network

Click Here