At the AMC portion of the TCA Press Tour, executive producers/writers Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould, who will be working on the show in a 50/50 capacity, spoke about the Breaking Bad spin-off, Better Call Saul. Because it is such a highly anticipated series, fan were disappointed when the premiere was pushed to 2015, but were also reassured by the fact that it’s already been given a second season pick-up.
During the interview, Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould talked about being limited by where the story ended up in Breaking Bad, that they’re currently breaking Episode 8 out of 10 for the first season, wanting to establish the show as its own thing rather than the series equivalent of a clips show, that there is a chance of Gus Fring (Giancarlo Esposito) making an appearance, when they realized they weren’t going to make their original airdate, how setting it in 2002 makes it a period piece, what other new characters we can expect to see, and how viewers should expect some non-linear storytelling. Check out what they had to say after the jump.
VINCE GILLIGAN: That’s a damn good question. It’s a challenge.
PETER GOULD: It reminds me a lot of when we started Season 5, and we had the machine gun in the trunk. We knew that that was the right image, at the beginning of Season 5, but we had no idea how the hell we were going to get there.
GILLIGAN: It’s a leap of faith, or stupidity, into the unknown. I thought it was going to be easy, going forward, because we know who this guy is. But we didn’t really know who this guy is, at all, when you think about it. He was a really interesting supporting character. Peter and I have taken long, long walks around our old Breaking Bad writers’ offices saying, “Wait a minute, how does this work?” It’s a very interesting process. There are certain limits that you have obviously identified for yourself. We know where this guy is going. We can’t, for instance, in the first episode, have him lose an arm or an eye, or something like that. He could have a glass eye.
GOULD: We know where the guy is going to end up, and we know that we’re going to bring him to that point. We know it’s not the name he was born with. And one of the questions that we ask ourselves a lot is, “What problem does being Saul Goodman solve?” That was our kick-off point.
GILLIGAN: We’re breaking Episode 8 out of 10, with 10 being the first-season order. It’s challenging, but it’s fun. It’s this Rubik’s Cube that you’re trying to solve. Although having said that, I’ve never actually solved one, in my life.
Is there any chance of you bringing Gus back?
GILLIGAN: There’s always a chance, yeah.
GOULD: These are all characters that we love. There’s so much more to say about Gus, and we certainly love Giancarlo [Esposito]. Having said that, we’re trying to make something that stands on its own that has entertainment value, and that’s not just seeing a series of old favorites. It’s not the series equivalent of a clip show. So, we’re trying to balance these things out.
GILLIGAN: I don’t think it’s giving anything away to say that we’re still feeling our way through this.
GILLIGAN: I’m going to take full responsibility for this and tell you the true story of this thing, which is that we could have made the deadline, but I am slow as mud as a TV writer. I always have been. It was my big fear, when I got the job on The X-Files. I had been writing movie scripts, and I didn’t know if I could write at a TV pace. I still feel that I’m very slow for television. We have a way of doing things that is slower than most TV shows. I think we average three weeks per episode, just breaking episodes. We did on Breaking Bad, and it’s not a big surprise to me that we’re doing the same thing with Better Call Saul because we want to think everything through.
You’ve already been picked up for an even longer second season of 13 episodes. How will you juggle that with Battle Creek?
GILLIGAN: Battle Creek is a show that I’m real proud of, from more of a spectator point of view. I don’t have as much to do with that show, in its current ongoing form, but I’ve seen the first episode and it’s really good. I’m not a good delegator. Luckily, I’m working with Peter, who is very easy. We’re partners. We’re working 50/50 on this, and it’s an interesting experience for me. I’d like to be more of a delegator. I’m a bit of a control freak. It’s easier to let go with Peter because Peter created the character of Saul Goodman. The first episode Saul ever appeared in was an episode Peter wrote, and Peter created this wonderful character who we identified with, in the first season or two, as being someone we thought could bear the weight of a spin-off. I can only work on one thing at a time, but as the show goes forward, it’s a 50/50 partnership, and it’s going to be Peter, more and more, as the series progresses.
How far ahead of Breaking Bad does this story start?
GILLIGAN: It’s 2002. It is period. We never completely nailed down when Breaking Bad took place. We tried hard to not be too specific as to when it was, but now we have to be a little more specific than we’re comfortable with. It is, indeed, a period piece. I can’t believe it, myself. It feels like it was yesterday, but it was 12 years ago. And there is a certain amount of effort, and blood, sweat and tears that goes into making it as factual and related to the period as possible.
GOULD: We have Michael McKean playing a character named Chuck, who is Saul’s brother. We have these two comedy legends working together, which is exciting. He’s one of the main characters that we’ve introduced, and he’s just a tremendous performer. He’s just great, and he also answers questions about Spinal Tap.
GILLIGAN: We also got Rhea Seehorn, who is a wonderful actress. She is just as cute as she can be, and is just a wonderful, funny actress, but also capable of a great deal of depth. She was a lot of fun to work with. And Michael Mando is an excellent young actor.
GOULD: There are a lot of lawyers and crooks, which I know will come as a big surprise.
There have been some reports that the show may not following a complete linear narrative, and that it will jump back and forth in time, maybe having some action taking place during the events of Breaking Bad, or even after. Is that something you’re considering?
GILLIGAN: I think the best way to answer this and not get in trouble is that you saw from Breaking Bad that we like non-linear storytelling. We like jumping around in time. I would definitely point you in the direction of anything that was possible on Breaking Bad, storytelling wise is possible on Better Call Saul. It’s fun for us to be as non-linear as possible.