Is General Zod the Villain in Zack Snyder’s SUPERMAN? Plus Snyder Talks About the Film

by     Posted 2 years, 259 days ago

zack_snyder_superman_logo_insignia_slice_01

I would that imagine that, as Superman, each and every day could be considered “busy.”  Without question, though, today has to have been one of the most hectic in recent memory for The Man of Steel.  As you probably already know, we learned earlier today that Zack Snyder is directing the Christopher Nolan produced Superman: The Man of Steel – news which finally brings to an end the whirlwind of speculation surrounding the gig and Nolan’s seemingly endless “shortlist.”

Now, as if the Snyder announcement wasn’t enough for one day, we are seeing unconfirmed reports regarding David Goyer’s script and Kal-El’s potential foe.  For more on this as well as several Snyder quotes in regards to the film, hit the jump.

superman_alex_rossPer a report from THR, Goyer’s script is believed to be akin to Richard Donner’s Superman films via the inclusion of General Zod as the primary villain.  While unconfirmed, Nolan has made it known that he wishes to place Superman within a realistic modern context for The Man of Steel.  With that in mind, it would make sense to have Superman fight it out with a fellow Kryptonian who, like Clark Kent, at least looks human.  While his esteemed nemesis Lex Luthor also fits this bill, other popular Superman villains such as Brainiac and/or Darkseid might not play as quite as “real” from a physical perspective.

Although only landing the job hours ago, word travels fast these days and Snyder has already discussed the film with several outlets.  On how Superman might be received by general audiences who may think of Superman as being a tad on the cheesy side, Snyder tells EW:

“I’ve followed Superman over the years,” he says. “I wouldn’t say I was a huge devotee, but I’ve kept an eye on the character in the pop culture, and as the pop culture has regarded him, for the past 10 years, especially. I think there’s a real opportunity here. He’s in the perfect place to do something.”

“Think of where Batman was when Chris took that on earlier in the decade. I think Superman is in a very similar place, in terms of being available and in terms of his relationship to where the culture was at that time. Superman is right there. He’s ready. And can I be any more cryptic?”

director_zack_snyder_image__1_

On working with Christopher Nolan, Snyder tells Heat Vision:

“In the initial meetings, he’s been super amazingly smart and also amazingly kind, filmmaker-to-filmmaker,” he said of Nolan. “I have great respect for him. The process has been amazing so far, and it looks like nothing but pluses.”

On talking about the story with Nolan in their initial meeting, Snyder tells MTV:

“It was really just talking about, in really sort of civilized and fun terms, who [Superman] was to us and what he could be,” he explained. “I think that those conversations felt free from the pressure of an ‘audition’ and felt more just talking about a character that we both liked. It was really, at that point, I was content if I was the one picked or not, that I had had a great visit. From a creative and fan point of view, I was satisfied, and that was cool.”

On the challenge inherent in taking over the character, Snyder tells USA Today:

“Mainly male (superheroes), have gotten to evolve over the years. Batman. The X-Men. But I think the first (Superman) movies were so well done, he kind of got stuck. I think our challenge is to bring him to a modern audience that’s still respectful of the character…We’re well aware, we’ve opened up a big can of worms.”

superman_alex_ross(2)

Obviously the film is still in the earliest stages of planning and there will be plenty of time for more informed discussion in the future.  For now, Snyder has to finish up his latest film Sucker Punch which is scheduled to hit theaters March 25th, 2011.  He will begin work on The Man of Steel shortly thereafter.  In the meantime, questions surrounding what Snyder’s involvement means for Xerxes remain largely unasked much less unanswered.

Briefly, and in closing, many have questioned whether or not Warner Bros. might bring back Brandon Routh to reprise his role in Snyder and Nolan’s film.  While unconfirmed, we are hearing early stirs which seem to rule out Routh’s return to the franchise.  For those of you who enjoyed Superman Returns, you have my deepest sympathies.  For the rest of us, here’s to hoping Snyder, Nolan, Goyer, and co. can give this generation a Superman film that, like The Man of Steel himself, can withstand the test of time.

superman_alex_ross_01

Sponsored Content



Please Like Collider on Facebook

Comments:
  • sense11

    This is turning out to be a really good day.

    • Jonyestrada

      has anyone noticed how every single post complaining about how DC needs to use other villians from the ROGUE gallery, are typically Smallville fans?

      Pathetic. Since when did Collider become trolled over by teens? They must not know the that DC is looking to take a more realistic (not fantastical) route to their DC properties. Seriously, it is a lost cause to hope for Bizaro, Braniac, and Darkseid. The story is and always has been Luthor and Zod. The others work well in comics, not feature films, and certainly not films set within the NOlan universe.

      IT WILL NOT HAPPEN. NO VILLIANS LIKE DARKSEID AND BIZARO WILL MAKE IT TO THE BIG SCREEN. GO BACK TO SMALLVILLE.

      BUahahahahahhahaha….

      • Mr_chuck_morris

        dude… have you even READ a Superman comic before?

      • Johhny Blaze

        The funny thing is you’ve proven to have zero knowledge of the character and this comment here solidifies that fact. What does Smallville have anything to do with wanting these characters? Take a second and at least google them so that you wont sound so damn ignorant, but then again you seem to enjoy being an ass. If anyone is trolling it’s you.

      • Johhny Blaze

        The funny thing is you’ve proven to have zero knowledge of the character and this comment here solidifies that fact. What does Smallville have anything to do with wanting these characters? Take a second and at least google them so that you wont sound so damn ignorant, but then again you seem to enjoy being an ass. If anyone is trolling it’s you.

      • puck a luck

        hey fuck you pal. the reason people are saying that is because we have already seen zod and lex. we want something different. lex and zod get boring. we dont want to see a remake of superman 2

      • Stevedore

        It’s amazing how every time you read a posting that uses terms like “Nolan universe” or feels the need to constantly compare every comic-film possibility to only The Dark Knight, you just know there’s the smell of some twenty-something, patchouli-drenched, pseudo-intellectual grad student in the air. As a real adult here who actually was alive for the original Superman films (and read the comics), I realize comics are at their heart fantastical, and any attempt to completely remove them from that realm is bending to a cynicism best left to your kind while you’re studying Marx and Nietzsche. While the uber-realism works for the Dark Knight, it does not for The Man of Steel. And how little imagination does one need to possess to not even be able to comprehend a super-intelligent android (Brainiac) as a villain? That is, providing it remains faithful to the comics. Zod has been done on film once and in a series. Lex has been trod to death in four film versions. Story expansion or variety shouldn’t be such dirty words.

  • Pingback: Is General Zod the Villain in Zack Snyder’s SUPERMAN? Plus Snyder Talks About … – Collider.com | Steel Prices

  • Adama

    Fuuu… Snyder shouldn’t be left near any franchise… after the soulless Watchmen he delivered (did he understand anything at all of the graphic novel?), we can only expect a all-flash-no-substances Superman. Worse if they decide to left out Routhl, who is a very good actor and with the right direction and script could be a great Superman. Our only hope is for Nolan to hold the worse directorial tics of Snyder….

    • sense11

      Brandon Routh will never play Superman again. Get over it.

      • jonathan

        Tom Welling will never play Superman again. Get over it.

      • Stevedore

        Neither should play him again. Here’s a novel idea: How about a MAN (?)!

    • nNark

      @Adama: Watchman – soulless? Really? Did you see a version done over by the ex-MST3K crew or something? Please take a deep breath and consider: multimillion dollar movie, adaptation of a difficult (and legendarily “unfilmable” story), distribution by a major studio not known for throwing good money on unpopular prospects, aimed at an audience that was NEVER going to be the masses who loved Iron Man, and a length that theater owners hate (they can’t squeeze as many showings into a day). THEN, Warners released Snyder’s unexpurgated version to DVD, so that no one could accuse them of only making a truncated adaptation. Soulless, eh? And, like me (we seem to be the only ones willing to admit this), you liked Singer’s Superman Returns. Well, hell, if I headed a major studio and cared about what you think, I’d just give up.

    • Maccam89

      He did a great job with Watchmen. The new ending, which I was enraged upon first hearing about, was actually an improvement on the graphic novel and opened up a whole new bag of themes to consider. The novel is obviously superior but visually and structurally Watchmen was a pretty good flick.

    • JD Dragon

      Routh would be good with a proper story (say, one with him actually throwing a punch instead of just lifting stuff up for two and a half hours) but I don’t think that Snyder should be written off right from the start. Consider this: 300 was a far cry from the graphic novel, but it did have a visually electric quality that sastisfied the senses. Watchmen was off script a bit, but I actually felt that the direction was a bit deliberate, almost like a high budget fan film (too much for too little time). I’ve thought that it would have been better as a 12 part mini series on HBO and the like. Nolan should bring out the best in Snyder, as any cinematic “Godfather” does. He may allow the visual feast fest, yet rein in the over-zealousness at times.
      o

    • JD Dragon

      Routh would be good with a proper story (say, one with him actually throwing a punch instead of just lifting stuff up for two and a half hours) but I don’t think that Snyder should be written off right from the start. Consider this: 300 was a far cry from the graphic novel, but it did have a visually electric quality that sastisfied the senses. Watchmen was off script a bit, but I actually felt that the direction was a bit deliberate, almost like a high budget fan film (too much for too little time). I’ve thought that it would have been better as a 12 part mini series on HBO and the like. Nolan should bring out the best in Snyder, as any cinematic “Godfather” does. He may allow the visual feast fest, yet rein in the over-zealousness at times.
      o

  • God of the old Testament

    They should go with Routh, he wasn’t the problem with Returns.

    • Megan

      Yes, his inability to act was the problem.

      • anonymous

        Brandon Routh is a fine actor. Go see Scott Pilgrim vs. The World if you disagree. It was the script and execution of Superman Returns that was bad.

      • anonymous

        Brandon Routh is a fine actor. Go see Scott Pilgrim vs. The World if you disagree. It was the script and execution of Superman Returns that was bad.

    • sense11

      Brandon Routh will never play Superman again. Get over it.

      • Jonyestrada

        Tom Welling will never play Superman on the big screen. Get over it.

  • Wdlukas

    Snyder better ease up on the slow-mo. Less is more.

    And Jesus, Zod again? Superman has a rich rogues gallery. Braniac, Ultra-Humanite, Metallo, Parasite… Why keep retreading the villains of Donner’s Supes? Make them look human if that’s the problem. (But not looking very human didn’t hurt the popularity of the movie version of Mystique.)

    • I hate ur god

      I’d personally like to see Cyborg Superman or Imperex.

    • jonathan

      To Wdlukas: give it a rest already with your ridiculous request to have those villians in the film. They are not realistic which is EXACTLY why you only got to see Joker and Two face in TDK and not any of the other dozens of villians from the “Rogue Gallery”. IT WILL NOT HAPPEN. ONLY REALISTIC CHARACTERS.

      • MrRich316

        I really don’t think “Realistic” characters are what is called for here. Its that kind of thinking that has kept Lex Luthor from becoming the mega villian that he is in the comics. In Donner’s Superman Lex was a small time joke of a criminal,and the character has been stuck in that vein in all the following films. No one wants to see that crap anymore. Batman has psychotics for rogues,Superman has Aliens,and superpowered beings. I love how all the Nolan fans want realism in a movie franchise that they clearly don’t understand…wonder if Nolan can’t quite envision it himself and that’s why he’s “godfathering” it instead of directing it. I hope Snyder starts the film of 300 style showing the destruction of Metropolis by an invading Darkseid.

      • dontbafool

        Wow…you left out Scarecrow. And you don’t write the scripts, so you can’t say what will and will not happen. And the reason for Joker in TDK….he is THE main adversary of Bats. So actually you have it EXACTLY wrong.

      • Jonyestrada

        To Dontbafool:

        Luthor and Zod are the main adversary of Supes – and both are the most realistic compared to Darkseid and Bizaro. I was right before. Now I am EXACTLY right.

        Thanks for the help.

      • Johhny Blaze

        All you seem to know is what you gathered from the movies. Darkseid is Superman’s greatest enemy besides Luthor and the biggest threat of all. Brainiac should also be a contender before Zod. The thing is, no one besides you really wants another Superman movie with Luthor or Zod again. You also don’t seem to understand that Superman isn’t exactly realistic. In fact you don’t seem to know anything about the character at all …

        Please, just go back to the hole you came from.

      • MrRich316

        The ONLY reason Luthor is the main adversary of Superman is because of how the character is written in the comics. Donner ruined the character for feature films.Bryan Singer(who is Superman’s greatest enemy) almost had Lex Luthor back on the right track when he had Lex swindle the old wealthy broad on her deathbed. He could have finally given us Lexcorp–but instead he turned it into Donner’s wet dream about land grabbing(again). So instead of let’s have L.L. use billions of dollars to kill Superman,he makes a giant kryptonite island.
        So, if you consider Luthor his main adversary I’d agree,but that’s only because that’s the crap we’ve been fed. Now we can have virtually any villian from Superman’s rogue gallery and have them look real even if they are CGI (Thank You Mr.Cameron). Why settle for a re-hash of old crap? Bring on Doomsday,Bring on Darkseid,Bring on Brainiac.Bring ANYTHING NEW!!!

      • puck a luck

        hey you are an idiot. Figure it out.

      • puck a luck

        hey you are an idiot. Figure it out.

      • Stevedore

        Has anyone even mentioned Bizarro as a possible villain choice but you? Bizarro would be, and was always, more comic relief than true villainy, much the way Lex was portrayed by Donner. I agree with MrRich316. The last thing any comic-film needs is camp. However, 2012-style destruction by the hand of Darkseid (not to mention the very cool idea of Boom Tubes) or even a take-over of technology devised by (the real) Brainiac seems more appealing than a bald man running around in a toupee yelling, “Miss Tessmaaaacheeeerrr!”

      • ARSENAL__22

        Any villian will work if done written well and a basic knowledge about their mythology in the comics is addressed. THe realism works in Batman because he is 100% human, while Superman is an alien. You can’t have Superman in an ultrarealistic world and not address him having to solve the BS we actually have to put up with, and to pay to watch that in a movie sucks. If you want ultra realism turn off your computer and take a walk outside.

      • Gregorro

        Since when was Superman ever about realism? Superman is an alien. He may look human, but he is in fact an alien from another world. Why then is he the only alien to appear in the films made so far, other than General Zod and his cronies in Superman 2, which still rocks!
        Aliens can be done if it is handled right. I thought they handled The Silver Surfer pretty well in The Fantastic Four, and Galactus. It didn’t take itself seriously and was just pure fun. I think they need to relax a bit with Superman and make it a bit more fun and not so serious like the last one which bombed. The world is already a serious and dangerous place for most people, we need these characters and movies to be larger than life because we use them to escape our lives for a couple of hours. I don’t want a tongue in cheek Superman movie, but I also don’t want a Dark Knight inspired Superman either.

      • ZOD

        Realistic? Like an invincible flying man from another planet? OK, I can’t wait to see Superman catch muggers and drug dealers who couldn’t even make him flinch if they had a f’n nuke! Aren’t there ENOUGH Lex Luther stories already? Super can kill Luthor with a f’n sneeze – can we see something BIGGER already?

      • Stevedore

        Jonyestrada: “ONLY REALISTIC CHARACTERS”? Truly? SUPERMAN IS NOT A REALISTIC CHARACTER! By your logic then, another Superman film would not be in production. OH, WAIT… IT IS!

        Krypton, lifting buildings, interstellar travel that’s faster than light speed, withstanding direct missile hits, the Phantom Zone… I suppose those are all realistic plot elements? Really? I suggest YOU GIVE IT A REST. You’re assertions are quite asinine.

  • SpitfireOverThames

    General Zod? Again? I think a Darkseid introduction would up the ante, especially if it was discovered that the actual reason for Krypton’s demise was Darkseid himself.

    Regardless, any villain but the same we’ve seen before (Luther, Zod) would be welcome. But it needs to be someone that can genuinely inflict pain on Supes (thus the reason Darkseid is perfect choice).

    At least under Nolan’s producing direction (& with the help of Snyder), the film will be in the best of possible hands…

    Sean Russell, London

    • areyoukiddingme

      In Superman lore & mythology there are two..count ‘em TWO main opposing forces vs Supes. TWO who have been the thorn in his side. Zod and Luthor. This is why it is what it is. Darksied is more suited for the Justice Leauge. And a smart villian does know how to inflict pain on Superman..if they are smart. People really don’t pay attention anymore, do they?

      • Stevedore

        It’s been done to death already. And that last one was a Singer-induced snoozefest that was more cloying, mediocre melodrama than “Super.” That’s what the “Man of Steel” should be… super, out of this world action and fun, with a well-written script and dialogue.

      • JD Dragon

        Actually, when you get right down to it, the greatest foe that Superman has ever faced has been himself. Comics by the dozens, if not hundreds, have been filled with his existential pining for the homeworld that no longer exists as well as the past he can never again touch. This being said, Zod and Luthor are key. However, this “singular entity” approach was embraced with the last film to mixed results. They tried to show Kal-El in a messianic role as a hero the world had forgotten. Consequently, very few could relate. Therefore, having him get his knuckles bloody on Darkseid or silver on Brainiac would most definitely be welcomed. After all, the greatest film was the first and that was a very very long time ago. Should we be dogmatic and constantly hold on to icons like Luthor and Zod who, while having delighted millions in the past, have already served their primary cultural purposes? I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t mind seeing a “two man enter… one man leave” with Brainiac, Darkseid or even (I hope) DOOMSDAY. Just think about it.

  • Dave91

    I love the appreciation and respect for Donner everyone has – and that everyone seems to recognize he hatchet job Bryan Singer did to Superman. I wonder what he thinks of all this. I’m excited to see what happens, with Nolan producing, it’ll be a strong story and the only thing that can ruin this is Snyder going overboard with the FX.

    Plus, I don’t mind a modern day Zod. It could be awesome. How can you make a realistic Braniac and Metallo or whatever Superman’s villains are – kneel before Zod!

    • Stevedore

      No one seems to recall that last year’s biggest hit (icckk) was a film with a bunch of blue cat-people swinging through trees preaching environmentalism in a world I found to be about as realistic as a Yahoo Chat avatar, yet you’re saying they can’t successfully make a realistic Brainiac? Does not compute.

  • http://twitter.com/grapenutsrbt Jim Goff

    There are a couple reasons I’m optimistic about this, but mostly it’s because I feel that if Chris Nolan really met with all those directors and he felt Zack was the one who’s ideas about Superman fit with the project the best, then I fully support his decision.
    I wouldn’t be surprised though if scheduling conflicts had something to do with Synder getting it as well.
    I’m also of the tribe that thinks Synder did a fine job with Watchmen. That book was unfilmable and he poured himself into it and made some bold choices.

    I trust Nolan’s decision.

    • http://twitter.com/grapenutsrbt Jim Goff

      Oh and Jon Hamm for Superman.

      • The.Watcher

        I completely agree with you – I loved the Watchmen movie, albeit only the DC/UC cuts.
        Furthermore, I like the ending of the movie more than the Giant Squid, that always seemed very far-fetched and stupid to me.

      • http://nevermindpopfilm.blogspot.com Fitz

        Yes.

  • Christophercantos

    Leo DiCaprio as Lex Luthor.

    if there’s Lex Luthor in the script, i hope Nolan pursues him. Nolan’s idea in casting roles for Superhero movies are do it in an ensembled way. ala Donner’s Superman. i hope Snyder learns from hs producer’s philosophy.

    if DiCaprio wants to make a huge impact, and i mean really big impact on today’s youth(people who don’t watch his super serious great films), then mae a big impact as Superman’s foe

  • Anonymous

    Cast Routh and I will suspend my disbelief. If they put themselves through another drawn out casting process it will only confirm how stupid this whole idea is in my mind.

    • StarTrek

      Casting Routh would be stupid. He can’t act and would just confuse the audience.

      • Anonymous

        What the huh? And recasting wouldn’t? Are you even old enough to remember the bad old days of a new Batman every other year?
        As for Routh’s acting, I’ll wager you thought Christian Bale’s “acting” in the Batman movies deserved an academy award. Maybe if they had gotten Routh to talk like a normal person as Clark Kent and a wrestler with throat cancer as Superman you’d have liked it better.

      • jonathan

        StarTrek is holding out for Tom Welling. HAHAHAHHHAhbuahahabuahahahaa. Unrealistic. Get past your smallville obsession.

      • Derangedserenity

        The worst thing about Routh in returns was that he was trying to do Reeve doing Superman.

      • Stevedore

        I agree Routh should not return, but everthing about that movie (except the weepy melodrama) was actually Singer trying to do Donner making Superman. The script, the lines, the directing… Routh, i believe, was probably just following direction.

    • sense11

      Neither Tom Welling or Brandon Routh will be in The Man of Steel.
      Get over it man.

  • Christophercantos

    i have a question? did Nolan really say that this Superman is going to be “realistic”? i thought he said that it would be more of a contermporary, modern take on Superman. i don’t think realistic was ever said in his statement.

    maybe people got confused because his Batman films are as realistic as you can go, that his produced-Superman will be.

    • Dave91

      Yeah you’re right, Nolan never said ‘realistic’… but ‘modern context’ sounds like he means something that can be plausible in the modern day, which kind of means ‘realistic’.

  • InfiniteMonkey

    Lois Lane better be a hot taller woman, not some short soulless actress like the last failed movie. A reporter of her stature should have some backbone in getting what she wants. She was a bloody wimp in the last one. Totally unbelievable.Oh yeah, Superman better be using the right muscles to showcase in this movie as well, instead of taking care of a blundering son that was totally directionless as a plot. Seriously a son? LOL!Give Superman something to crack his knuckles on and not just fly about. I want to see him get bloodied a little and really use his intellect to get out of situations and save the planet. Make this a most auspicious entry to the world. This had better announce that he is back for good until some idiot wants to bloody reboot ten years from now! Don’t bother with that rubbish of gently coming in. Superman is Superman and he should be that way! Minimise the bloody BS!

    • sense11

      Your a correct sir.
      “Superman vs Lex Luthor’s Real Estate Scam & The Super Baby Mama Drama”
      was not a good movie and it only gets worst as time goes by.

      • Mr_chuck_morris

        This was the best comment I’ve read on anything, ever.

      • Mr_chuck_morris

        This was the best comment I’ve read on anything, ever.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HJ32HAF57JDNQSEPAW6IVJRKPM Rashad

    Routh was a perfect Superman

    • LOL

      Bizarro Superman of backward world. Where wooden acting is good and Jon Hamm-type award winners are bad.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HJ32HAF57JDNQSEPAW6IVJRKPM Rashad

        Jon Hamm is as one note as anyone.

        Routh was fine.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HJ32HAF57JDNQSEPAW6IVJRKPM Rashad

        Jon Hamm is as one note as anyone.

        Routh was fine.

      • LOL

        Exhibit A: Bizarro logic at its finest.

      • Maccam89

        I liked Routh but calling Jon Hamm one note pretty much voids your opinion.

    • sense11

      In the worst Superman movie since Quest for Peace. Poor guy is a victim of circumstance and Bryan Singers shitty directing.

      • Jonyestrada

        Superman Returns was the best Superman movie since “Superman: The Movie”.

  • Pingback: Graphic Novels, Comics and Movies - Page 14

  • Pingback: Zack Synder to direct Superman | The Film Pilgrim

  • Giomets154575

    If he wasnt already labeled as such a comedic actor i think Patrick Warburton fits the Look of these pics of superman perfectly

    • Tonamania

      He’d make an excellent Shazam

    • sense11

      Puddy?

    • ZOD

      The Tick?

  • meeemememememmee

    with snyders sylistic flare and Nolans depth ofstorytelling, this can be realy quite something.

  • TheTrickster

    Now we need to hear two words: Jon Hamm.

  • Tonamania

    Looking forward to seeing the owl movie on Netflix. Looking forward to seeing sucker punch in theaters.

    Still annoyed that the possibility of a Darkseid or Doomsday is being ruled out. (C’mon, you’ve got Snyder as director. Snyder + Doomsday = holy crap!)

  • Tdlutheran

    Regarding Superman Returns, there were many problems. Kevin Spacey was not cast well as Luthor, Kate Bosworth was a washout as Lois, and the primary villain was a rock island made of kryptonite? Awful idea.
    I like Idris Elba of the Wire fame as Luthor, he literally played a gangster version of Luthor on the Wire and would be awesome at it. Lois should be played by Kate Beckinsale or Evangeline Lilly from Lost. Right amount of looks and spunk.
    I just hope Nolan has enough oversight of this film to make it on par with BAtman Begins, Dark Knight and Inception.

  • Tonamania

    Serious question here. Now that Snyder is the guy, any chance of Gerry Butler as the Man of Steel? Seriously.

    • The Truth

      Seriously, NO!

    • Junkmailgoodness

      I could see him as Zod.

  • JohhnyBlaze

    No more Luther or Zod for christ sake. Give us Darkseid or at least Brainiac or gtfo!

    • jonathan

      Do not give us Darkseid. Too cheesy and too cartooney. Anyone with the name Darkseid sounds like a villian from a bad made for tv movie.

      • Johhny Blaze

        It’s a movie about an alien named SUPERMAN. You don’t think much do you?

      • jonathan

        that’s no excuse Johhny blaze. Using Darkseid as the villian for this movie is utter non-sense. Look at what happens when you include “VILLLIAN FROM ROGUE GALLERYYYYYYY!!!!!”: the incredible hulk (norton version_) with that ridiculous overgrown meatball. They had epic battles in the City’s down town and the movie was nothing more than a big pile of Johny Blaze crap.

      • jonathan

        that’s no excuse Johhny blaze. Using Darkseid as the villian for this movie is utter non-sense. Look at what happens when you include “VILLLIAN FROM ROGUE GALLERYYYYYYY!!!!!”: the incredible hulk (norton version_) with that ridiculous overgrown meatball. They had epic battles in the City’s down town and the movie was nothing more than a big pile of Johny Blaze crap.

      • Johhny Blaze

        Your logic is so extremely asinine it’s unbelievable. Hulk is an unbelievable character so you can put him up agains’t Muhammad Ali and it’s not going to make the movie any more realistic or good for that matter. Same thing applies for Superman. You obviously don’t even know who these characters are either, so why are you arguing again?

        P.S. I accidentally hit the like button when replying to your prior idiotic comment. Don’t get too excited about that one.

      • Animatt27

        your one of those guys who buys a t shirt with the superman symbol on it, just so people go…”whoa…he must read comics….look at his shirt”……if you were any kind of superman fan you would embrace whatever villain they put on screen……Go back to gotham idget!

  • A_Fan1

    A Rumor has Guy Pearce set to play General Zod in coming weeks!

    Would this be true?

    • Tonamania

      I think you made it up, but that would be awesome

  • Serena Champness

    They better not include Lex Luthor or General Zod in the new Superman movie or any Superman movies for a while. There are many Superman villains that have not been used in the movies but have been used on Smallville such as Bizarro, Brainiac, Doomsday, Metallo, Toyman and shortly, Darkseid. Other villains that they can use include Atomic Skull, Bloodsport, Bruno Mannheim, Conduit, Cyborg Superman, Faora, Gog, Imperiex, Intergang, Jax-Ur, Kryptonite Man, Livewire, Mala, Mercy Graves, Mongul, Morgan Edge, Mr. Mxyzptlk, Parasite, Prankster, Sam Lane, Silver Banshee, Solaris, Superboy-Prime, Superman Revenge Squad, Terra-Man, Titano, Ultra-Humanite, Ultraman.

  • Zod

    KNEEL BEFORE ZOD BITCHES!

  • Glockno-rehopper

    Butler: This..Is…Metropolis!

  • Spano01

    there was no problem at all with routh or returns. the problem is that people keep comparing it to reeve and his 1 and 2. routh just so happened to be the next actor to take on the role in film so he would be overlooked as not as great as chris reeve. reeve is no doubt the legend. routh should have had more time to work on his superman which i felt superman returns to be a great movie. 3.5/4

    • sense11

      Yea whatever, it had nothing to do with the fact that Synger made a direct sequel to Superman 2 and that he had Routh act exactly like Christopher Reeves. Marlo Brando is in the movie for christ sake.

      “Superman vs Lex Luthor’s Real Estate Scam & The Super Baby Mama Drama”
      was not a good movie and it only gets worst as time goes by.

  • sense11

    Gerard Butler for General Zod

    • jonathan

      “Gerald Butler for General Zod” LOL. thank god this will never happen. Butler should remain a law abiding citizen. Lol.

  • toxiclogic

    Dude, Batman worked in a realistic context because Batman IS realistic, as a character. Superman is an orphaned alien that just happens to look exactly like a human being with extraordinary powers whose planet just up and exploded. So… Aliens already exist in Supermans world. Is it that far fetched to include equally as unrealistic villans?

  • DUDE

    AWESOME!!!!!!!!

  • Darkdimensions

    Please use different villans. Why keep using the same old crap over and over. It gets BORING.

  • Pat

    Although not a fan of the watchmen movie,I trust Chris Nolan(Inception was amazing, so was The Dark Knight) and his decision making.I did like 300.I wonder however,about Snyders ability to turn out a family friendly character like superman.He certainly will be able to get the heroic part of supermans nature down because King Leonidas was one of he more inspiring characters in movie history.

  • cheesecakellama

    Superman sucks because his villians suck. Lex Luthor is lame as hell, and nobody wants to see Zod again.
    Want to make a successful popular Superman movie? Give us Darkseid.

  • Epickickboxer

    It’s obvious that certain villains will never make it to the big screen (Darkseid, Bizarro, Mr. Mxyzptlk and so on). However it’s strange that film makers are so obsessed with placing Superman in a realistic world. For instance, the article theorized that Darkseid and Brainiac aren’t believable enough for the film-makers to include on film because they don’t look human enough. That may be true, but why?

    Superman is an alien: Film goers can believe that.

    He’s an alien that looks exactly like us: Astronomically improbably, but sure, why not?

    He can fly, has super strength, heat vision and (most amazingly) doesn’t look silly wearing a cape and spandex. Some how, this is still within the realm of believability?

    And yet, despite all reason, like many who saw the 1978 movie, I believed a man (alien?) could fly.

    I think the public is more willing to suspend disbelief than film-makers give them credit. Movies have made us accept a lot of weird ideas in the past: Keanu doing Kung fu, Maguire as Spider-man, Michael Cera winning a fight against anyone. Somehow we believe.

    Zack Snyder is an odd choice, but if you think about it (at least for me) it seemed inevitable. He an up-in-coming talent, it was just a matter of time before the reigns of a massive franchise were handed over. Snyder seems to have a certain level of skill and a distinctive style. That style often trumps substance, but his movies in general are goodish.

    Oh well… I hope the movie is good regardless. I actually liked Superman Returns, but having Superman spend the whole movie catching falling things, may not have been a master stroke. Zod’s a good villain; Superman should be punching a bad guy.

  • Mike

    i have been on board with this movie ever since i heard Nolan was producing it… i trust Nolan and Goyer to resurrect the man of steel…. Zach Snyder wasnt the guy i thought they were going to choose but hes by no means a terrible choice i enjoyed Watchmen (even though the graphic novel is eternally better lol) and 300 was pretty good …. As for Zodas the main villain i personally have no problem … yea hes been used before but that was over 30 years ago whos to say Goyer and Nolan cant put a new spin on this character and make him relevant again? Then again i do see why people would complain because the thought of Doomsday or Darkseid or Braniac(my fav) sounds awesome and is def a radical change from the past Superman Movies ….As for Superman Returns it was mediocre and thats the problem no Superman movie should just be mediocre ! And they butchered the relationship between Clark and Lois

  • Pingback: Where Does South Park Go from Here?

  • http://nevermindpopfilm.blogspot.com Fitz

    I’d like to see SNyder take Hamm along with him.

    • Jakolero

      Hamm looks too old to be superman.

    • Jakolero

      Hamm looks too old to be superman.

  • Pingback: Brandon Routh to Star in MISSING WILLIAM

  • thieres

    caramba vei, quando voces vao fazer um filme do seperome x apocalipse. ai simmm vai ter um otimo retorno em dinheiro para voces… ass thicard@hotmail.com

  • thieres

    caramba vei, quando voces vao fazer um filme do superman x apocalipse ou x darkside. ai simmm vai ter um otimo retorno em dinheiro para voces… ass thicard@hotmail.com

  • tla

    I want Brandon Routh to play Superman AGAIN!! He’s so sexy!!

  • Lisa_30

    If Zack Snyder were smart he’d bring in Brandon Routh again. Think about it? He plays the character really well it just needs a better script. Do you know how many teens would go for this? If it were written really well it would make a killing like twighlight. Teens love this kind of stuff…one hero who loves only one gal. Seriously. No brainer.

  • fred

    Cool. I grew up with the Christopher Reeve Superman movies and I absolutely loved them. Yeah the 4th one not so much, but the other three I loved. I also didn’t realise how well cast those movies were until I saw Superman Returns. I really disliked that film, but I also thought the casting was terrible. I thought Routh was an ok superman, but not great. I thought the people playing Lois, Lex, Jimmy, and the Chief, were all really bad though. It wouldn’t have been too bad if it was yet another lame Lois & Clark TV series or something, but for a big Hollywood movie? Ouch, terrible choices.

    But yeah anyway, I really hope this movie gets some more love, care, and attention than the last one did. I would love for this generation to get a Superman movie that was as good as the ones I had as a kid.

  • Mrweebit

    Use Mister Mxyzptlk

  • Superman

    Awesome. While I do really want to see an epic alien villian for Supes, I have a feesling that the Snyder-Nolan-Goyer-WB execs- super movie team are simply going to wet our appetite with a villian who’s equal to Superman’s abilities.

    This will leave enough room too top this movie villian with one in the sequel that’s more to the fan boy liking , i.e. Darkseid, Doomsday, etc.

    Either way, I’m sure epicness will ensue with both films.

  • Joey

    How about no freaking Zod or fake Lex Luthors anymore. Lets drop the damn Donnor scenarios. We want Brainiac, Darkside, Parasite, Metallo, Bizarro or Doomsday. I want the real Lex Luthor (tycoon/part scientist) as seconadry villian in background. How about Suicide Squad and Amanda Waller in new movies. We need Superman to show his real powers and potential. We want a real Lois Lane that is like comics (newer good looking version plz).
    I hate people keep copying from campy older Superman movies. We want comic storylines.

  • Joey

    How about no freaking Zod or fake Lex Luthors anymore. Lets drop the damn Donnor scenarios. We want Brainiac, Darkside, Parasite, Metallo, Bizarro or Doomsday. I want the real Lex Luthor (tycoon/part scientist) as seconadry villian in background. How about Suicide Squad and Amanda Waller in new movies. We need Superman to show his real powers and potential. We want a real Lois Lane that is like comics (newer good looking version plz).
    I hate people keep copying from campy older Superman movies. We want comic storylines.

  • Stevedore

    I really don’t understand all the whining about how a new film “has to be realistic” or “can’t have this villain, can’t have that villain” because they are “not realistic…” whine, whine, whine. NEWSFLASH: the entire notion of Superman IS NOT REALISTIC. If there’s so much whining about realism why bother even to make a Superman film. I’ll tell you why. Because he is an archetypal figure to cheer for and watch be, well, super. He is not the anti-hero that Batman is, nor should a film about him be done in some hyper-realistic, noirish style that is all the fad today. He is not a bleak or cynical character, nor is his world, largely due to the fact that he (Superman) is in it.

    No one seems to recall that last year’s biggest hit was a film with a bunch of blue cat-people swinging through trees preaching environmentalism in a world I found to be about as realistic as a Yahoo Chat avatar, yet Superman won’t be successful if it isn’t “realistic?” Really? No, I think it will do just fine, even with an out-of-this-world plot line, provided it is not some soul-searching, overly angsty piece of dreck that takes itself too seriously (i.e. that cloyingly melodramatic snoozefest that Singer committed to celluloid). And if they attempt to take Superman down the path of the Dark Knight to any great extent, they run that same perilous risk.

    • Anonymous

      you are missing the key points about incorporating realism – certainly the hyperbol world that exist for superheroes to operate and function within obviously bears not even a scrap of realism, which is perfectly fine, I don’t have a problem with this, but to say that Cameron’s Avatar served your eyes and ears with purely unrealistic acting, dialogue (although somewhat debatable as Sigorney did at times sound like she had been scripted by Mamet which I like anyway), special effects, etc would be wrong. The vast majority of successful fantasy and science fiction films project swathes of realism in order to captivate and immediately transport audiences into another world, although the world is unrealistic, this is quickly forgotten by cinema goers due to the high production involved in making everything seem believable, don’t tell me the first three Alien films were too poorly executed and were way down on the believabilty scale, nor can you say the same about the lord of the rings, or the first two superman films, or the BUrton and Nolan batman films, the original star wars, raiders of the lost ark, the list is extensive and exhuastive; now examine Snyder’s films – now I know you’re not going to tell me Dawn of the Dead was more realistic than Romero’s original black and white night of the living dead, and I know you won’t marry the realism word with 300, but you may have a point with certain scenes in Watchman,particular good examples of realism employed here was the prison scenes and the dialogue. But overall Snyder’s worlds are not appropriate, he loves his slow-mo which is very dated, just look at how Clark Kent’s alley run in the opening of superman2 and how it conveys speed of transition, don’t you think it is far more effective, even today than any of Snyder’s slow-motionary, for lack of a better…

  • Anonymous

    Not a single iota of magic-realism exists in any of Snyder’s films – what is realistic magic you may ask, well, it is the art of superman, of course, something that was clearly absent in SReturns when compared to the first two Donner/Lester films, so much so I had to reach for the blue pill and erase the mind of such disturbing visual experiences. granted, Snider possesses film-making credentials, but he lack all of thenecessary arstic integrity needed for Superman; just compare his films – nothing feels real in any of his products, filmakers ought to be realmakers, that is to say they are architects of visual fiction that must be delivered with uncompromising reality; Spielberg, Cameron, the Scott bros. Donner, amongst a select few others, all understand this, for it is the sole reason their earlier films seem so REAL, example? Take the scenes in the first two Superman motion pictures and compare it with not only the sacrilege thrown up in superman returns, but also many of Snyder’s work – there are simply no people in his films; please let me explain Far too often directors – contemporary screenwriters are also guilty of this crime -neglect scenes of everyday life that add weight to realism, in favour of the main characters; it is gravely important that characters, especially those that belong in the comic book genre, are not overly concentrated on. Snyder and even Nolan do this time and time again. Okay Nolan gets away with it as Batman is less hyperbolic and sci-fi than the Man of Steel. But these f**king idiots better understand that in order to project a realistic and believable reincarnation of Superman, other people aside from the main characters need to be shown to exist. Again, I draw whatever attention you have left during my rant, to the first two Superman films and you will see a clear reality incorporated in the pictures because people unrelated to the main plots were always used to deliver the realism needed. Furthermore, the transition or morphing from Clark Kent to the man of Steal is at its best in these films – consider Mr. Reeves shirt-ripping moment where the buttons are heard popping or diving out of the daily planet window in the first film or his running down the alley and morphing into Superman in the opening of the second movie. one only has to watch these films again for the benchmark quality it preserves, so much so Sam – Spiderman – Raimi studied these films microscopically before engineering his own take on Peter Parker because he wanted to see how regular everyday folks and crowds are utilised to further cements in the reality needed for the superheroes to appear believable. Superman returns made me tea-bag the entire f**king auditorium. I’d say Singer go F*ck himself, were it not for the Unusual Suspects and his 2 X-man films, where he clearly demonstrated what is needed, but lord knows why the f*ck he chose to ignore this artistic approach to Sreturns, but f*ck it. Point is these elements are important in order to bring the necessary magic and realism that Snyder has never brought into to his own work. If he can’t do this, the rule is simple in its purity; if you can’t create something that’s not only better than good, but beyond the very best, expect to see my faeces being thrown at the cinema screen!!!

    • http://superherolegacy.com/technology/spideys-slinging-technology-the-web-shooter/ Superhero Legacy

      Villains other than Zod and Luthor CAN work on the big screen. I say do Darkseid or Brainiac.

  • Stupid Idiot

    i’m so stupid. Hey stupid who called me stupid. :-) i’m stupider. I lost my glasses so I need to by a new pair so I can find my old pair. Hey Stupid, how much is 1 1/3 + 2.65= ______

Features

Demand Media Entertainment

Click Here